[1]沈际勇 李梦滢 王克霞.疾病诊断相关组和医师费评价医师绩效的比较[J].中国卫生质量管理,2018,25(02):013-15.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2018.25.2.04]
点击复制

疾病诊断相关组和医师费评价医师绩效的比较
分享到:

《中国卫生质量管理》[ISSN:1006-7515/CN:CN 61-1283/R]

卷:
第25卷
期数:
2018年02期
页码:
013-15
栏目:
特别关注
出版日期:
2018-03-28

文章信息/Info

作者:
沈际勇 李梦滢 王克霞
清华大学附属北京清华长庚医院
关键词:
绩效医师费疾病诊断相关组
Keywords:
Performanc Physician Fee Diagnosis Related Groups
DOI:
10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2018.25.2.04
摘要:
随着公立医院绩效制度改革的深入,主治医师绩效评价越来越重要。本研究以北京清华长庚医院2016年5月至2017年3月的住院服务的实际数据为例,采用医师费(PF)和疾病诊断相关组(DRGs)两种方案计算,计算结果表明,两方案的导向性一致,均可起到控费效果。
Abstract:
With the reform of the performance system in public hospitals, the performance evaluation of attending physician is more and more important. The study used Physician Fee (PF) system and Diagnosis Related Groups (DRGs) to evaluate the data of Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital from May 2016 to March 2017, and the results showed that the orientation of the two schemes was consistent and all had the medical expense control effect.

参考文献/References:

[1]潘莉,刘晓星,马文红,等. 公立医院常用绩效评价方法公平性研究[J].中国医院,2015,39(19):1-3.

相似文献/References:

[1]张竞,丁利华.设置骨科行政主任助理对科室绩效管理的影响[J].中国卫生质量管理,2015,22(06):039.
[2]刘莹,王吉善,张丹,等.医院绩效管理团队奖的实践与探索[J].中国卫生质量管理,2015,22(06):116.
[3]刘启刘翠牛婷婷王筱慧柯骏钟海忠项耀钧.基于综合指数法的病种绩效评价研究[J].中国卫生质量管理,2017,24(02):021.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2017.24.2.07]
[4]夏述旭 王曼丽 施楠 陶红兵.紧密型医疗联合体绩效影响因素指标构建[J].中国卫生质量管理,2018,25(03):107.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2018.25.3.33]
[5]杨岳利周营新范江荣江波涛.创伤骨科两种绩效二次分配方案比较研究[J].中国卫生质量管理,2021,28(01):082.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2021.28.1.22 ]
 YANG Yueli,ZHOU Yingxin,FAN Jiangrong.Comparative Study of Two Performance Secondary Allocation Schemes in Traumatic Orthopedic Department[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2021,28(02):082.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2021.28.1.22 ]
[6]马尚寅 高关心 张海悦 边雨桐 苑艺 刘嘉吉.从公立医院绩效考核政策分析三级与二级公立医院功能定位与发展导向差异[J].中国卫生质量管理,2021,28(03):089.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2021.28.3.27 ]
 MA Shangyin,GAO Guanxin,ZHANG Haiyue.Analyzing the Functional Orientation and Development Difference between Tertiary and Secondary Public Hospitals from the Performance Appraisal Policy of Public Hospitals[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2021,28(02):089.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2021.28.3.27 ]
[7]梁春萍梁业梅.以工时为核心的护士绩效考核实践[J].中国卫生质量管理,2022,29(01):066.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.1.17 ]
 LIANG Chunping,LIANG Yemei.The Practice of Nurse Performance Appraisal with Working Hours as the Core[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2022,29(02):066.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.1.17 ]
[8]许昌钟婉婷陶红兵陈芸庄俊汉罗斌周健刘颜刘天钊熊昊祾王干一王亚楠程兆辉.两种DRGs指标体系的绩效评价效果比较研究[J].中国卫生质量管理,2022,29(02):019.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.2.06 ]
 XU Chang,ZHONG Wanting,TAO Hongbing.Comparative Study on Performance Evaluation Effect of Two DRGs Index Systems[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2022,29(02):019.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.2.06 ]
[9]张振于志一李江峰崔楠丁磊蒋光峰.基于熵权-TOPSIS-RSR联合法的临床科室DRGs绩效综合评价研究[J].中国卫生质量管理,2023,30(07):038.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2023.30.7.09 ]
 ZHANG Zhen,YU Zhiyi,LI Jiangfeng.Comprehensive Evaluation of DRGs Performance in Clinical Departments Based on Entropy Weight-TOPSIS-RSR Joint Method[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2023,30(02):038.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2023.30.7.09 ]

更新日期/Last Update: 2018-03-28