[1]杨岳利周营新范江荣江波涛.创伤骨科两种绩效二次分配方案比较研究[J].中国卫生质量管理,2021,28(01):082-84.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2021.28.1.22 ]
　YANG Yueli,ZHOU Yingxin,FAN Jiangrong.Comparative Study of Two Performance Secondary Allocation Schemes in Traumatic Orthopedic Department[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2021,28(01):082-84.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2021.28.1.22 ]
点击复制

创伤骨科两种绩效二次分配方案比较研究
分享到：

《中国卫生质量管理》[ISSN:1006-7515/CN:CN 61-1283/R]

卷:
第28卷
期数:
2021年01期
页码:
082-84
栏目:
人力资源与绩效
出版日期:
2021-01-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparative Study of Two Performance Secondary Allocation Schemes in Traumatic Orthopedic Department
作者:
杨岳利周营新范江荣江波涛
咸宁市中心医院
Author(s):
YANG Yueli; ZHOU Yingxin; FAN Jiangrong
Xianning Central Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hubei University of Science and Technology
关键词:
创伤骨科; 疾病诊断相关组; 绩效; 二次分配; 分配系数; 综合评价
Keywords:
Traumatic Orthopedic Department; Diagnosis Related Groups; Performance; Secondary Distribution; Distribution Coefficient; Comprehensive Evaluation
分类号:
R192.3;R68
DOI:
10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2021.28.1.22
文献标志码:
B
摘要:
目的通过比较创伤骨科两种绩效二次分配方案，探索更能体现临床医师工作绩效的分配方案，为医院绩效改革提供借鉴。方法对6名带组医师通过现行绩效二次分配方案（以二次分配系数为原则）确定绩效系数；基于DRG指标从3个维度6项指标采用综合指数法进行评价。对比两种方案下医师绩效排名。结果科室绩效二次分配结果排名在两种不同方案中结果差异明显。基于DRG的综合绩效评价法更加科学、合理、公平。结论医院在绩效二次分配中引入DRG需完善三级医师分组体系，提高病案首页质量，加强医院信息化建设，确保DRG指标的可获得性。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo compare the two performance secondary allocation schemes in Traumatic Orthopedic Department to explore the allocation scheme that could better reflect the work performance of clinicians, so as to provide reference for the hospital performance reform. MethodsThe performance coefficients were determined by 6 group-leader physicians through the current performance secondary allocation scheme (secondary allocation coefficient as the principle). Based on DRG indexes, the evaluation was carried out from three dimensions and six indexes using the comprehensive index method. Physician performance rankings were compared between the two schemes.ResultsThe results of the secondary allocation of department performance were significantly different in the two schemes. The comprehensive performance evaluation method based on DRG was more scientific, reasonable and fair.Conclusion In the performance secondary allocation scheme, hospital should improve the three-level physician grouping system, improve the quality of the first page of medical records, strengthen the construction of hospital informatization, and ensure the availability of DRG indicators.

参考文献/References:

［1］江蒙喜.建立符合行业特点的公立医院薪酬制度的思考［J］.卫生经济研究,2019,36(5):3-5. ［2］仇嫒雯,贲慧,姚晶晶.基于RBRVS 与DRG 的公立医院绩效薪酬考评应用探索［J］.中国卫生经济,2019,38(4):72-75. ［3］王国强,张会会,焦婷婷,等.DRG 在医院心血管内科专业绩效管理中的应用［J］.卫生经济研究,2019,36(9):57-60. ［4］刘明跃,王迪,邓艳宁,等.住院病案首页对DRGs绩效评价的影响［J］.中国病案,2018,19(2):37-40. ［5］胡靖琛,程羿嘉.基于DRGs的眼科住院医疗服务绩效分析［J］.中国卫生质量管理,2019,26(4):20-24. ［6］陈倩,秦明伟.GRGs在医院绩效管理中的应用［J］.中国卫生质量管理,2019,26(2):40-42. ［7］仇叶龙,王力红,李小莹,等.运用DRGs方法对医院神经专科住院医疗绩效的分析［J］.中华医院管理杂志,2015,31(11):855-858. ［8］马忠凯.病案首页质量控制对DRG的影响分析［J］.中国卫生经济,2018,37(12):94-95. ［9］白雪娟，胡燕生，梁金凤. 病案信息数据与医院精细化管理［J］.中国病案，2014,14(10):18-20.

相似文献/References:

[1]沈际勇 李梦滢 王克霞.疾病诊断相关组和医师费评价医师绩效的比较[J].中国卫生质量管理,2018,25(02):013.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2018.25.2.04]
[2]许轲 杨剑 马建辉 邱亭林.DRGs在临床亚专科同行竞争力评价中的应用[J].中国卫生质量管理,2019,26(01):029.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2019.26.1.10]
[3]熊昊祾 路伟 许昌 林小军 黄亦恬 罗斌 郭志武 陶红兵.病案首页数据质控的实践[J].中国卫生质量管理,2019,26(04):005.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2019.26.4.02]
[4]席峰 路阳 陆晨.基于DRGs的医疗服务综合能力评价实践[J].中国卫生质量管理,2019,26(04):031.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2019.26.4.09]
[5]牛文奇李文瑾丁磊蒋光峰.两种DRG绩效评价方法的应用效果比较研究[J].中国卫生质量管理,2021,28(12):036.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2021.28.12.11 ]
　NIU Wenqi,LI Wenjin,DING Lei.Comparative Study on the Application Effect of Two Diagnosis Related Group Performance Evaluation Methods[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2021,28(01):036.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2021.28.12.11 ]
[6]龙雨曦袁向东黎浩.我国医保支付改革下按病种分值付费的探讨与建议[J].中国卫生质量管理,2022,29(04):018.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.4.05 ]
　LONG Yuxi,YUAN Xiangdong,LI Hao.Exploration and Suggestions of Implementing Diagnosis Intervention Packet under the Reform of Medical Insurance Payment in China[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2022,29(01):018.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.4.05 ]
[7]胡靖琛李煜刘明孝马宗奎程羿嘉张媛媛.基于DRG的主诊组医疗服务能力综合评价[J].中国卫生质量管理,2022,29(04):025.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.4.07 ]
　HU Jingchen,LI Yu,LIU Mingxiao.Comprehensive Evaluation of Medical Service Capability among Attending Physician Groups Based on DRG[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2022,29(01):025.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.4.07 ]
[8]熊瑶邹伏英.通过主诊医师负责制提升医疗质量管理水平[J].中国卫生质量管理,2022,29(08):025.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.8.06 ]
　XIONG Yao,ZOU Fuying.Improving Medical Quality Management Through Attending Physician Responsibility System[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2022,29(01):025.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.8.06 ]

更新日期/Last Update: 2021-01-28