PDF下载

[1]陈静吕伯瀚李少波刘慧松赵晓敏王凯选.护士隐性缺勤量表的汉化及信效度检验[J].中国卫生质量管理,2025,32(10):46-50.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2025.32.10.10]
　CHEN Jing,LYU Bohan,LI Shaobo.Chinese Adaptation and Reliability and Validity Testing of the Sickness Presenteeism Scale for Nurses[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2025,32(10):46-50.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2025.32.10.10]

点击复制

护士隐性缺勤量表的汉化及信效度检验

《中国卫生质量管理》[ISSN:1006-7515/CN:CN 61-1283/R] 卷: 32 期数: 2025年10期页码: 46-50 栏目: 护理质量出版日期: 2025-10-15

Title:: Chinese Adaptation and Reliability and Validity Testing of the Sickness Presenteeism Scale for Nurses

作者:: 陈静吕伯瀚李少波刘慧松赵晓敏王凯选; 青岛市市立医院

Author(s):: CHEN Jing; LYU Bohan; LI Shaobo; Qingdao Municipal Hospital

关键词:: 护士; 隐性缺勤; 护理质量; 量表汉化; 信效度

Keywords:: Nurses; Sickness Presenteeism; Nursing Quality; Scale Translation; Reliability and Validity

分类号:: R47

DOI:: 10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2025.32.10.10

文献标志码:: A

摘要:: 目的汉化护士隐性缺勤量表（Sickness Presenteeism Scale-Nurse，SPS-N）并检验其在临床护士中的信效度。方法基于Brislin模型对SPS-N量表进行翻译、回译、文化调适、预测试等，形成中文版SPS-N量表。采用便利抽样法选取山东省5所三甲综合医院的480名临床护士进行调查，评价量表的信效度。结果中文版SPS-N量表共有4个维度21个条目。量表总体Cronbach’s α系数为0.925，重测信度为0.856。量表的内容效度指数为0.97，条目的内容效度指数为0.86~1.00。探索性因子分析提取的4个公因子（情绪、患者安全、一般表现、团队内部关系）共解释了总变异的63.194%，验证性因子分析各项拟合指标均达到理想标准。各因子组合信度均＞0.7，平均变异数抽取量均＞0.5。各因子平均变异数抽取量平方根均大于该因子与其他因子的相关系数。结论中文版SPS-N量表具有良好的信效度，可作为我国护士隐性缺勤的可靠测评工具。

Abstract:: ObjectiveTo translate the Sickness Presenteeism Scale-Nurse (SPS-N) into Chinese and evaluate its reliability and validity among clinical nurses. MethodsBased on the Brislin model, the SPS-N was translated, back-translated, culturally adapted, and pre-tested to develop the Chinese version of the SPS-N. Using convenience sampling, 480 clinical nurses from 5 grade A tertiary general hospitals in Shandong Province were surveyed to assess the reliability and validity of the scale.ResultsThe Chinese version of the SPS-N consisted of four dimensions with 21 items. The overall Cronbach’s α coefficient of the scale was 0.925, and the test-retest reliability was 0.856. The content validity index of the scale was 0.97, with item content valiclity index ranging from 0.86 to 1.00. Exploratory factor analysis extracted four common factors (emotions, patient safety, general performance, and inter-team relationships), which collectively explained 63.194% of the total variance. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that all fit indices met ideal standards. The composite reliability of each factor was more than 0.7, and the average variance extracted for each factor was more than 0.5. The square roots of the arerage variance extracted for each factor were greater than the correlation coefficients between that factor and other factors. Conclusion The Chinese version of the SPS-N demonstrates good reliability and validity and can serve as a reliable assessment tool for measuring sickness presenteeism among nurses in China.

参考文献/References:

［1］HUNG SP,MING JL,TSAO LI,et al.A preliminary qualitative exploration of the lived experiences of presenteeism among Taiwanese nursing staff［J］.J Nurs Adm,2024,54(12): 40-45.［2］任正.护士隐性缺勤影响因素和作用后果及其防控对策研究［D］.长春:吉林大学,2023.［3］MIN A,KANG M,PARK H.Global prevalence of presenteeism in the nursing workforce: a meta-analysis of 28 studies from 14 countries［J］.J Nurs Manag,2022,30(7):2811-2824.［4］GERLACH M,HAHN S,ROSSIER C,et al.Presenteeism among nurses:an integrative review［J］.Int J Nurs Stud Adv,2024（7）:100261.［5］KOOPMAN C,PELLETIER KR,MURRAY JF,et al.Stanford presenteeism scale:health status and employee productivity［J］.J Occup Environ Med,2002,44(1):14-20.［6］SHAN GY,WANG SN,FENG K,et al.Development and validity of the nurse presenteeism questionnaire［J］. Front Psychol,2021（12）:679801.［7］BARIS VK,INTEPELER SS,UNAL A.Development and psychometric validation of the sickness presenteeism scale-nurse［J］.Int J Nurs Pract,2023,29(5):e13168.［8］王晓娇,夏海鸥.基于Brislin经典回译模型的新型翻译模型的构建及应用［J］.护理学杂志, 2016,31(7):61-63.［9］PERNEGER TV,COURVOISIER DS,HUDELSON PM,et al.Sample size for pre-tests of questionnaires［J］.Qual Life Res,2015,24(1):147-151.［10］陈晨,吴艳芳,王亚喜,等.儿科护理缺失量表的汉化及信效度检验［J］.中国卫生质量管理, 2024,31(9):62-67.［11］吴明隆.问卷统计分析实务-SPSS操作与应用［M］.重庆:重庆大学出版社,2010：20-45.［12］姚琳,张笑倩,段晓旭,等.肥胖患者饮食行为评估量表的汉化及信效度检验［J］.中华护理杂志,2024,59(20):2509-2514.［13］BUJANG MA.A simplified guide to determination of sample size requirements for estimating the value of intraclass correlation coefficient:a review［J］.J Dent Sci, 2017,12(1):1-11.［14］王凯选,李培宇,王文远,等.心力衰竭患者照顾者自我护理贡献量表的汉化及信效度检验［J］.中华护理杂志,2022,57(13):1585-1590.［15］贾雪敬,史宝欣.腹膜透析照顾者负担量表的汉化及信效度检验［J］.中华护理杂志, 2024,59(21):2633-2639.［16］张晨,周云仙.我国护理测量工具文献中内容效度指数应用误区分析［J］.护理学杂志, 2020,35(4):86-88,92.［17］高肖,魏丽丽,周海清,等.多维度护理代际特征问卷的汉化及信效度检验［J］.中华护理教育,2024,21(5):580-586.［18］邓翠玉,黎晓松,赵欣,等.健康素养敏感性沟通问卷的汉化及信效度检验［J］.中国卫生质量管理,2025,32(4):66-69,73.［19］荣泰生. AMOS与研究方法［M］. 2版.重庆:重庆大学出版社,2010:17.［20］李云霞,雷先阳,宁檬,等.心理痛苦耐受性量表的汉化及在青年HIV感染者/AIDS患者中的信效度检验［J］.中华护理杂志,2023,58(7):891-897.［21］王思琦,范玲.护士出勤主义行为的研究进展［J］.中华护理杂志,2024,59(5):634-640.

相似文献/References:

[1]王淑贤,葛白娟,杨松兰,等.某院一级质控护士核心能力现状调查研究[J].中国卫生质量管理,2015,22(06):46.
[2]陶然李萍.突发公共卫生事件应急救援护士自我评价调查[J].中国卫生质量管理,2018,25(05):13.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2018.25.5.05]
[3]张瑞雪杨蓉黄淑绮梁燕陈德智何凌霄.神经内科护士工作士气现状分析[J].中国卫生质量管理,2018,25(05):74.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2018.25.5.23]
[4]王海燕何梅李希西喻明成.规范化培训护士岗位管理实践[J].中国卫生质量管理,2019,26(01):61.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2019.26.1.19]
[5]李姗侯铭郭健李萍.基于DRGs和RBRVS的护士绩效薪酬改革方案的探索[J].中国卫生质量管理,2020,27(03):59.
　LI Shan,HOU Ming,GUO Jian,et al.Nurse Performance Salary Reform Scheme Based on DRGs and RBRVS[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2020,27(10):59.
[6]朱艳宋瑰琦*乔晓斐程超.安徽省乡镇卫生院护士培训需求调查分析[J].中国卫生质量管理,2020,27(04):80.
　ZHU Yan,SONG Guiqi,QIAO Xiaofei,et al.Investigation the Training Demand of Nurses in Township Health Centers in Anhui Province[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2020,27(10):80.
[7]曹璐璐何梅崔丽君李桂蓉.规范化培训护士核心能力与心理资本的关系研究[J].中国卫生质量管理,2020,27(05):63.
　CAO Lulu,HE Mei,CUI Lijun,et al.Relationship between Core Competence and Psychological Capital of Nurses with Standardized Training[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2020,27(10):63.
[8]陶秋艳马旭东芮曦李奇李尊柱苏龙翔王璐孙建华罗红波马千惠王金阁张媛媛马鸿鸣周翔刘大为.ICU护理人力资源配置对脓毒症休克集束化治疗完成率的影响[J].中国卫生质量管理,2021,28(08):43.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2021.28.8.12 ]
　TAO Qiuyan,MA Xudong,RUI Xi.Effect of ICU Nursing Manpower Allocation on the Completion Rate of Cluster Therapy for Septic Shock[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2021,28(10):43.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2021.28.8.12 ]
[9]周恒刘芳王艳段然叶继玲龙治任.成都市医养结合机构护士工作满意度现状及影响因素分析[J].中国卫生质量管理,2021,28(09):55.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2021.28.9.15 ]
　ZHOU Heng,LIU Fang,WANG Yan.Analysis of Current Situation and Influencing Factors of Job Satisfaction of Nurses in Medical and Nursing Institutions in Chengdu[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2021,28(10):55.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2021.28.9.15 ]
[10]柯键黄素芳江敏邓娟肖亚茹李咪琪.护士主导的高血压管理范围综述[J].中国卫生质量管理,2022,29(01):57.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.1.15 ]
　KE Jian,HUANG Sufang,JIANG Min.A Scoping Review of Hypertension Management Leading by Nurses[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2022,29(10):57.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.1.15 ]

更新日期/Last Update: 2025-10-15