[1]周恒刘芳王艳段然叶继玲龙治任.成都市医养结合机构护士工作满意度现状及影响因素分析[J].中国卫生质量管理,2021,28(09):055-58.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2021.28.9.15 ]
　ZHOU Heng,LIU Fang,WANG Yan.Analysis of Current Situation and Influencing Factors of Job Satisfaction of Nurses in Medical and Nursing Institutions in Chengdu[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2021,28(09):055-58.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2021.28.9.15 ]
点击复制

成都市医养结合机构护士工作满意度现状及影响因素分析
分享到：

《中国卫生质量管理》[ISSN:1006-7515/CN:CN 61-1283/R]

卷:
第28卷
期数:
2021年09期
页码:
055-58
栏目:
护理质量
出版日期:
2021-09-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
Analysis of Current Situation and Influencing Factors of Job Satisfaction of Nurses in Medical and Nursing Institutions in Chengdu
作者:
周恒刘芳王艳段然叶继玲龙治任
成都市第八人民医院
Author(s):
ZHOU Heng; LIU Fang; WANG Yan
Chengdu 8th People's Hospital, Chengdu
关键词:
护士; 医养结合机构; 工作满意度; 影响因素
Keywords:
Nurse;  Medical and Nursing Institutions;  Job Satisfaction;  Influencing Factors
分类号:
R47
DOI:
10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2021.28.9.15
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的调查分析成都市医养结合机构护士工作满意度现状及影响因素，为稳定医养结合机构护理人员队伍提供参考。方法采用护士工作满意度量表（Mueller/McCloskey Satisfaction Scale，MMSS），选取成都市110所医养结合机构在职护士进行调查。使用SPSS 22.0软件进行统计分析。结果共回收有效问卷519份。成都市医养结合机构护士工作满意度总分为（96.57±14.20）分，其中，“对同事满意”维度得分率最高（72.25%），其次为“工作被赞扬和认可”（70.39%），“福利待遇”维度得分率最低（57.65%）。多元线性回归分析显示，夜班次数（t=-4.104，P＜0.001）、机构等级（t=3.222，P=0.001）和工作年限（t=-2.716，P=0.007）是影响医养结合机构护士工作满意度的重要因素。结论成都市卫生相关部门及各医养结合机构管理者应在发挥自身优势的同时，结合影响因素制定多种满意度提升措施，以稳定医养结合机构护理人员队伍，提高养老护理服务质量。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo investigate and analyze the status quo and influencing factors of the job satisfaction of nurses in the medical and nursing institutions in Chengdu, and to provide reference for stabilizing the nursing staff in the medical and nursing institutions.Methods The Mueller/McCloskey Satisfaction Scale (MMSS) was used to investigate nurses in 110 medical and nursing institutions in Chengdu. The SPSS 22.0 software was used for statistical analysis. ResultsA total of 519 valid questionnaires were collected. In Chengdu, the total score of nurses' satisfaction was 96.57±14.20, among which, the score rate of "satisfied with colleagues" was the highest of 72.25%, followed by "praised and recognized" (70.39%), and the score rate of "welfare treatment" was the lowest (57.65%). Multiple linear regression analysis showed that the number of night shift (t=-4.104, P<0.001), institution level (t=3.222, P=0.001) and working years (t=-2.716, P=0.007) were the important factors affecting the job satisfaction of nurses in the medical and nursing institutions.Conclusion The health departments and the managers of the medical and nursing institutions in Chengdu should make use of their own advantages. Furthermore, combined with influencing factors, a variety of satisfaction improvement measures were developed to stabilize the nursing staff in the medical and nursing institutions and improve the quality of elderly nursing services.

参考文献/References:

［1］张涛,罗昊宇.法国医养结合服务实践与思考［J］.中国卫生质量管理,2018,25(4):128-130,133. ［2］成都市2019年老年人口信息和老龄健康事业发展状况报告［N］.成都日报，2020-04-03(07). ［3］王小元，王美丹，田杨，等.医养结合视角下医院与养老机构护理人员工作衔接的探讨研究［J］.中国医学创新，2019，16(7):100-104. ［4］Hays WL.Using multivariate statistics［J］.Psyc CRITIQUES，1983，28(8):642. ［5］Price M. Job satisfaction of registered nurses working in an acute hospital［J］.Br J Nurs，2002，11(4):275-280. ［6］杨丽宏.护士护理工作环境感知度及其影响因素的研究［D］.锦州: 锦州医科大学，2017. ［7］习璐竹，柳家贤，周英，等.广州市医养结合养老机构护士职业获益感及工作满意度研究［J］.中国实用护理杂志，2020，36(20):1592-1596. ［8］李芳芳.临床护士工作满意度影响因素分析［J］.实用中医药杂志,2020,36(11):1507-1508. ［9］吴喜卿,陈晶梅.我院护理人员工作满意度与离职意愿相关性研究［J］.中国现代医生,2019,57(36):111-115. ［10］张艳. 北京市某三级甲等医院护士工作满意度的调查研究［J］.护理实践与研究,2016，13（1）：95-97. ［11］石陆华，丁文彬.新医改形势下临床护理队伍稳定性及相关因素研究［J］.中国社会医学杂志，2019，36(1):94-98. ［12］赵瑾，赵菁，冯晨秋.某三级甲等医院护士工作满意度和离职意愿现状及其相关性［J］.解放军护理杂志，2016，33(2):21-25. ［13］李秀雅，黄峥，周婷，等.北京市4所三级甲等综合医院临床护士工作幸福感现状及其影响因素分析［J］.中华现代护理杂志，2021，27(5):651-655. ［14］成都市统计局.关于2019年全市城镇全部单位就业人员平均工资的公告［EB/ OL］.［2020-06-01］.http://gk.chengdu.gov.cn/govInfo/detail.action?id=2645896&tn=2. ［15］庄丽玲，江晓萍，庄陆香，等.探讨急诊科护士对夜班排班满意度的现况及影响因素［J］.护理实践与研究，2020，17(24):27-29. ［16］黄蝶卿，黄惠根，申叶林，等.非夜班护士岗位管理的实施方法与成效［J］.中国护理管理，2017，17(1):91-94. ［17］付莉莉,陈声宇.基层医疗机构护士工作任务的调查研究［J］.中华护理杂志,2018,53(4):473-476. ［18］刘瑶,黄跃,鞠梅.中国医养结合养老机构护理人力资源研究进展［J］.西南医科大学学报,2019,42(1):81-84.

相似文献/References:

[1]王淑贤,葛白娟,杨松兰,等.某院一级质控护士核心能力现状调查研究[J].中国卫生质量管理,2015,22(06):046.
[2]陶然 李萍.突发公共卫生事件应急救援护士自我评价调查[J].中国卫生质量管理,2018,25(05):013.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2018.25.5.05]
[3]张瑞雪 杨蓉 黄淑绮 梁燕 陈德智 何凌霄.神经内科护士工作士气现状分析[J].中国卫生质量管理,2018,25(05):074.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2018.25.5.23]
[4]王海燕 何梅 李希西 喻明成.规范化培训护士岗位管理实践[J].中国卫生质量管理,2019,26(01):061.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2019.26.1.19]
[5]李姗 侯铭 郭健 李萍.基于DRGs和RBRVS的护士绩效薪酬改革方案的探索[J].中国卫生质量管理,2020,27(03):059.
　LI Shan,HOU Ming,GUO Jian,et al.Nurse Performance Salary Reform Scheme Based on DRGs and RBRVS[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2020,27(09):059.
[6]朱艳宋瑰琦*乔晓斐程超.安徽省乡镇卫生院护士培训需求调查分析[J].中国卫生质量管理,2020,27(04):080.
　ZHU Yan,SONG Guiqi,QIAO Xiaofei,et al.Investigation the Training Demand of Nurses in Township Health Centers in Anhui Province[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2020,27(09):080.
[7]曹璐璐 何梅 崔丽君 李桂蓉.规范化培训护士核心能力与心理资本的关系研究[J].中国卫生质量管理,2020,27(05):063.
　CAO Lulu,HE Mei,CUI Lijun,et al.Relationship between Core Competence and Psychological Capital of Nurses with Standardized Training[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2020,27(09):063.
[8]陶秋艳马旭东芮曦李奇李尊柱苏龙翔王璐孙建华罗红波 马千惠王金阁张媛媛马鸿鸣周翔刘大为.ICU护理人力资源配置对脓毒症休克集束化治疗完成率的影响[J].中国卫生质量管理,2021,28(08):043.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2021.28.8.12 ]
　TAO Qiuyan,MA Xudong,RUI Xi.Effect of ICU Nursing Manpower Allocation on the Completion Rate of Cluster Therapy for Septic Shock[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2021,28(09):043.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2021.28.8.12 ]
[9]柯键黄素芳江敏邓娟肖亚茹李咪琪.护士主导的高血压管理范围综述[J].中国卫生质量管理,2022,29(01):057.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.1.15 ]
　KE Jian,HUANG Sufang,JIANG Min.A Scoping Review of Hypertension Management Leading by Nurses[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2022,29(09):057.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.1.15 ]
[10]梁春萍梁业梅.以工时为核心的护士绩效考核实践[J].中国卫生质量管理,2022,29(01):066.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.1.17 ]
　LIANG Chunping,LIANG Yemei.The Practice of Nurse Performance Appraisal with Working Hours as the Core[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2022,29(09):066.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.1.17 ]

更新日期/Last Update: 2021-09-28