[1]贺万静银丽娟.某市2015年-2017年死因监测数据质量分析[J].中国卫生质量管理,2020,27(04):063-65.
　HE Wanjing,YIN Lijuan.Data Quality Analysis of Death Surveillance System in a City from 2015 to 2017[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2020,27(04):063-65.
点击复制

某市2015年-2017年死因监测数据质量分析
分享到：

《中国卫生质量管理》[ISSN:1006-7515/CN:CN 61-1283/R]

卷:
第27卷
期数:
2020年04期
页码:
063-65
栏目:
医疗质量
出版日期:
2020-07-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
Data Quality Analysis of Death Surveillance System in a City from 2015 to 2017
作者:
贺万静银丽娟
毕节市疾病预防控制中心
Author(s):
HE Wanjing; YIN Lijuan
Firstauthor's addressBijie Center for Disease Control and Prevention
关键词:
死因监测; 数据质量; 质量分析
Keywords:
Cause of Death;  Data Quality; Quality Analysis
分类号:
R197.323；R54
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的对毕节市死因监测数据进行质量分析，为进一步完善毕节市死因监测工作提供参考。方法使用死亡率、最高诊断单位构成、最高诊断依据构成、根本死因编码不准确比例等指标对毕节市2015年-2017年的死因监测情况进行评价。结果2015年-2017年毕节市死因监测点常住人口死亡病例41 594例，死亡率 567.83/10万；2015年-2017年毕节市死因监测点死者生前最高诊断单位为二级医院和三级医院的占比较高，生前最高诊断依据为可靠依据的占比60%左右，根本死因编码不准确比例2.76%。结论毕节市的死因监测数据质量有所提升，但总体上并不乐观，建议通过政府主导、部门合作、专业支撑等方式改善毕节市死因监测现状。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo analyze data quality of death surveillance system in Bijie from 2015 to 2017, and provide reference for improvement.MethodsThe quality of death cause repots was analyzed and evaluated by death rate,proportion of the highest diagnostic units, proportion of the highest diagnostic evidence,coding accuracy of root death cause.ResultsFrom 2015 to 2017, a total of 41 594 cases of death were reported by Bijie mortality surveillance system, with the overall mortality of 567.83/100 thousand.It was higherthat ratio of the highest diagnostic units were secondary and tertiary medical institutions,around 60% of the highest diagnostic evidence was reliable,and the encoding inaccurate ratio of root death cause was 2.76%. Conclusion The data quality of death surveillance system had improved,but it was not optimistic in Bijie. It was suggested to improve the status of death surveillance by government leading, department cooperation and professional support.

参考文献/References:

［1］邢秀雅，贺琴，陈叶纪，等.安徽省 2013-2014 年全国疾病监测系统死因监测数据质量评价［J］.安徽预防医学杂志，2016,6(22):384-427.

相似文献/References:

[1]卫荣.健康医疗大数据质量治理研究[J].中国卫生质量管理,2020,27(03):005.
　WEI Rong.Quality Governance of Health Care Big Data[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2020,27(04):005.
[2]李进燕任晓霞罗涛仲夏.多院区数据上报平台的设计与应用[J].中国卫生质量管理,2022,29(06):074.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.6.19 ]
　LI Jinyan,REN Xiaoxia,LUO Tao.Design and Application of Multi-District Hospital Data Reporting Platform[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2022,29(04):074.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.6.19 ]
[3]徐帆舒婷.高级别医院电子病历系统数据质量评价及对策研究[J].中国卫生质量管理,2022,29(12):006.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.12.02 ]
　XU Fan,SHU Ting.Data Quality Evaluation and Countermeasures of Electronic Medical Record System in High-Level Hospital[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2022,29(04):006.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.12.02 ]
[4]张娴静王爱荣鲁冰柏杨崔文彬赵明赵蓉.以数据为驱动的上海市级医院绩效监测评价与促进平台建设及思考[J].中国卫生质量管理,2023,30(01):001.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2023.30.1.01 ]
　ZHANG Xianjing,WANG Airong.Construction and Consideration of Performance Monitoring, Evaluation and Promotion Platform Driven by Data in Shanghai Municipal Hospitals[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2023,30(04):001.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2023.30.1.01 ]
[5]陆家发赵群唐凯张国明郝艳杨雪蓉.江苏省全民健康信息平台数据治理实践研究[J].中国卫生质量管理,2023,30(08):063.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2023.30.8.13 ]
　LU Jiafa,ZHAO Qun,TANG Kai.Data Governance Practice of Jiangsu National Health Information Platform[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2023,30(04):063.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2023.30.8.13 ]
[6]刘媛 汪刚.基于PDCA的病案数据质量风险治理研究[J].中国卫生质量管理,2025,32(02):038.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2025.32.2.10]
　LIU Yuan,WANG Gang.Research on Risk Governance of Medical Record Data Quality Based on PDCA[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2025,32(04):038.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2025.32.2.10]

更新日期/Last Update: 2020-07-28