[1]马宗奎胡靖琛刘明孝李煜.基于DRGs的TOPSIS和RSR模糊联合法评价心血管内科医疗服务能力[J].中国卫生质量管理,2020,27(03):55-58.
　MA Zongkui,HU Jingchen,LIU Mingxiao,et al.Evaluation of Medical Service Capability in Department of Cardiovascular Medicine by Using the Fuzzy Combined Method of Weighted TOPSIS and RSR Based on DRGs[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2020,27(03):55-58.

点击复制

基于DRGs的TOPSIS和RSR模糊联合法评价心血管内科医疗服务能力

《中国卫生质量管理》[ISSN:1006-7515/CN:CN 61-1283/R] 卷: 第27卷期数: 2020年03期页码: 55-58 栏目: 关注DRG 出版日期: 2020-05-28

Title:: Evaluation of Medical Service Capability in Department of Cardiovascular Medicine by Using the Fuzzy Combined Method of Weighted TOPSIS and RSR Based on DRGs

作者:: 马宗奎胡靖琛刘明孝李煜; 武汉大学人民医院

Author(s):: MA Zongkui; HU Jingchen; LIU Mingxiao; et al; Hubei General Hospital, Wuhan University, Wuhan

关键词:: 疾病诊断相关分组; 综合评价; 医疗服务能力

Keywords:: Diagnosis Related Groups (DRGs); Comprehensive Evaluation; Medical Service Capacity

分类号:: R197.323；R54

文献标志码:: B

摘要:: 目的基于疾病诊断相关分组指标，对心血管内科各病区医疗服务能力进行评价，为改善医疗服务计划提供指导。方法收集2018年研究医院心血管内科住院患者病案首页数据，以2016版BJ-DRGs为工具进行分组，依据能力、效率、安全3个维度的6个指标，运用加权TOPSIS和RSR模糊联合法评价各病区的医疗服务能力。结果评价靠前的3个病区是B、A、E，表明医疗服务能力较强，排名靠后的4个病区是D、F、C、G。结论基于DRGs指标的加权TOPSIS和RSR模糊联合法的评价结果与医院当前的绩效考核结果基本一致，且能更加科学、便捷、高效地反映各病区医疗服务能力的真实水平，为医院加强学科内涵建设指明了方向。

Abstract:: ObjectiveTo evaluate the hospital service capability in the Department of Cardiovascular Medicine based on the diagnosis related groups (DRGs), to provide guidance on improvement of health service plan.MethodsThe home page data of medical records of inpatients in the Department Of Cardiovascular Medicine in 2018 were collected and grouped with the 2016 edition of BJ-DRGs as a tool. The medical service ability of each ward was evaluated by the weighted TOPSIS and RSR fuzzy combination method according to 6 indicators from 3 dimensions of ability, efficiency and safety.ResultsThe top three wards were B、A、E which showed better medical service capacity, and the last four wards were D、F、C、G.Conclusion The evaluation results of the weighted TOPSIS and RSR fuzzy joint method based on DRGs indexes were basically consistent with the current performance assessment results of the hospital, which can reflect the true level of medical service capacity of each ward more scientifically, conveniently and efficiently, indicating the direction for the hospital to strengthen the construction of subject connotation.

参考文献/References:

［1］李珑，徐锡武，王辰．疾病诊断相关组概述及其在我国的适应性分析［J］.中国医院管理，2013，33（1）：51－53．

相似文献/References:

[1]谢秋娟仲立儒.应用综合评价方法分析某院医疗质量水平[J].中国卫生质量管理,2016,23(05):26.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2016.23.5.08]
[2]董乾陈金彪陈虎房耘耘.DRGs国内发展现状及政策建议[J].中国卫生质量管理,2018,25(02):1.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2018.25.2.01]
[3]李春漾冯海欢孙麟.胆囊炎疾病诊断相关分组与细分组研究初探[J].中国卫生质量管理,2018,25(02):9.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2018.25.2.03]
[4]莫陶欣王丹杨煦冷家骅刘晶薛冬.基于DRGs肿瘤专科医院精细化管理探讨[J].中国卫生质量管理,2018,25(02):16.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2018.25.2.05]
[5]王艳梅高桂华随冬侠朱文伟.DRGs病组付费下病房护理管理实践[J].中国卫生质量管理,2018,25(02):23.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2018.25.2.07]
[6]刘莉燕李廷贵彭瑞琴左爱芳石贞仙何新梅康凯宁.三级医院科室综合评价指标体系的构建[J].中国卫生质量管理,2018,25(04):53.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2018.25.4.17]
[7]王海银周佳卉房良彭颖金春林.美国DRGs发展演变、支付特征及对我国的启示[J].中国卫生质量管理,2018,25(06):25.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2018.25.6.09]
[8]王笑君刘国庆沈汉斌胡牧李迎张斌向毅赵亮卢钰付霆潘文晶.医联体内分级诊疗DRGs实证研究[J].中国卫生质量管理,2018,25(06):44.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2018.25.6.15]
[9]晏鑫刘小平郭梓鑫龚斐王蕾施娣梁辰.DRGs相关文献计量学分析[J].中国卫生质量管理,2019,26(04):1.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2019.26.4.01]
[10]李春漾孙麟.阑尾炎疾病诊断相关分组细分组研究[J].中国卫生质量管理,2019,26(04):9.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2019.26.4.03]

更新日期/Last Update: 2020-05-28