[1]徐桔密罗莉曹建文狄建忠.基于波士顿矩阵的医疗纠纷管理研究[J].中国卫生质量管理,2022,29(10):068-72.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.10.15 ]
　XU Jumi,LUO Li,CAO Jianwen.Medical Dispute Management Research Based on Boston Matrix[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2022,29(10):068-72.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.10.15 ]
点击复制

基于波士顿矩阵的医疗纠纷管理研究
分享到：

《中国卫生质量管理》[ISSN:1006-7515/CN:CN 61-1283/R]

卷:
第29卷
期数:
2022年10期
页码:
068-72
栏目:
服务质量
出版日期:
2022-10-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
Medical Dispute Management Research Based on Boston Matrix
作者:
徐桔密罗莉曹建文狄建忠
上海市第六人民医院
Author(s):
XU Jumi; LUO Li; CAO Jianwen
Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital
关键词:
波士顿矩阵; 医疗纠纷; 赔款; 风险评估; 科室管理; 患者安全
Keywords:
Boston Matrix;  Medical Dispute;  Compensation;  Risk Assessment;  Department Management;  Patients safety
分类号:
R197.323
DOI:
10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.10.15
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的针对医疗纠纷赔款案件的危害性进行风险分类分析，为提升科室医疗安全管理水平提供参考。方法分析某院2016年-2019年125例医疗纠纷赔款案件，借鉴波士顿矩阵模型，将医疗纠纷发生科室及原因围绕损害性（均次损害量化值）、损失性［每床位（均次）赔款金额］、发生频次3个指标进行风险分类。结果医疗纠纷赔款案件高发科室主要是骨科（33.6%）和普外科（23.2%），发生原因主要是责任心不强（22.4%）、手术不当（20.8%）、漏诊误诊（16.8%）。“高床位赔款，高损害风险”科室有心外科及普外科，“高床位赔款，低损害风险”科室有泌尿外科、骨科及神经外科；“高赔款，高损害风险”医疗纠纷原因有漏诊误诊、用药不合理、医疗并发症、手术不当，“低赔款，高损害风险”医疗纠纷原因有院内感染、责任心不强。结论波士顿矩阵模型能够为医疗纠纷防范提供风险评估工具，从而助力科室安全管理。管理者可结合风险评估结果，采取差异化管理策略。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo classify and analyze the harm of medical dispute compensation cases, and provide reference for medical safety management in departments.MethodsA total of 125 medical dispute compensation cases in a hospital from 2016 to 2019 were analyzed. By referring to the Boston matrix model, the departments and causes of medical disputes were classified according to three indicators: damage (quantified value of damage per time), loss ［amount of compensation per bed (per time)］ and frequency.ResultsThe most common departments of medical dispute compensation cases were orthopedics (33.6%) and general surgery (23.2%), and the main reasons were not strong sense of responsibility (22.4%), improper operation (20.8%), missed diagnosis and misdiagnosis (16.8%). The "high bed compensation, high damage risk" departments included Department of Cardiac Surgery and Department of General Surgery, "high bed compensation, low damage risk" departments included Department of Urology Surgery, Department of Orthopedics and Department of Neuro Surgery. The reasons for "high compensation, high damage risk" included missed diagnosis and misdiagnosis, improper medication, medical complications and improper surgery, while the reasons for "low compensation, high damage risk" included nosocomial infection and weak sense of responsibility.Conclusion The Boston matrix model can provide a risk assessment tool for the prevention of medical disputes, so as to facilitate the safety management of departments. Managers can adopt differentiated management strategies based on the risk assessment results.

参考文献/References:

［1］赵 炽,祝 彬.医疗纠纷实证研究与对策探讨：基于对南京市鼓楼区医调委2010—2013年受理案件的分析［J］.南京医科大学学报(社会科学版),2015,15(5):349-354. ［2］刘 宝,胡善联.实施《医疗事故处理条例》值得关注的几个问题［J］.中华医院管理杂志,2003,19(4):205-207. ［3］刘 宇,柏涌海,王 沛,等.上海某三甲医院医疗纠纷影响因素研究［J］.中国卫生质量管理,2019,26(3):75-78. ［4］韩斌斌.波士顿矩阵在医院科室运营分析中的应用［J］.中国总会计师,2016(1):126-127. ［5］胡龙军,杨佳芳,王清江,等.162例医疗纠纷赔偿事件回顾分析与启示［J］.中国卫生质量管理,2019,26(1):42-45. ［6］罗 莉,殷 佳,魏 伟,等.公立医院优势学科病种绩效管理研究：以骨科为例［J］.中国卫生质量管理,2021,28(7):48-51. ［7］石镁虹,章 桦.医疗损害纠纷案件赔偿影响因素分析及赔偿模型的构建:基于1 072例医疗损害纠纷案例的研究［J］.中国卫生事业管理,2015,32(9):698-701. ［8］刘 宇,冷 峰,施文大,等.基于服务差距模型的医疗纠纷现状［J］.解放军医院管理杂志,2021,28(7):656-658. ［9］蒋向玲,张 莉,廖旭嘉,等.某院快速康复体系建立与实践［J］.中国卫生质量管理,2021,28(8):31-34. ［10］庞娇艳,陆 莉,陈翠华,等.巴林特小组及相关培训对医护人员沟通能力和应对方式的影响［J］.解放军护理杂志,2015,32(20):60-63. ［11］伍小群,黄 凤.住院患者跌倒风险管理的成效分析［J］.护理学杂志,2018,33(5):45-47.

相似文献/References:

[1]张雪梅,张灵丽,杨帆,等.182份封存病历管理相关问题研究[J].中国卫生质量管理,2016,23(04):034.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2016.23.3.12]
[2]邵辰杰 闫翔 俞青 邓润智 任红润 尹颖 周扬.科室值班主任制度在处理医疗纠纷中的应用[J].中国卫生质量管理,2018,25(01):048.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2018.25.1.17]
[3]吴占勇 吴春富 杨士杰 张亚丽 马振兴 韩月起 孟国印 张宏亮.双高会诊及高危手术强化沟通程序的应用探讨[J].中国卫生质量管理,2018,25(04):075.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2018.25.4.24]
[4]刘宇 柏涌海 王沛 单冬冬 陆莉.上海某三甲医院医疗纠纷影响因素研究[J].中国卫生质量管理,2019,26(03):075.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2019.26.3.21]
[5]计光跃 钱明平 胡龙军.医疗纠纷综合管理系统的开发与应用[J].中国卫生质量管理,2020,27(05):090.
　JI Guangyue,QIAN Mingping,HU Longjun.Development and Implementation of Comprehensive Medical Disputes Management System[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2020,27(10):090.
[6]曹竞予张宇萌张琳琳尹梅张雪.医疗损害责任纠纷司法裁判现状及对策研究：以护理纠纷为例[J].中国卫生质量管理,2021,28(01):088.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2021.28.1.24 ]
　CAO Jingyu,ZHANG Yumeng,ZHANG Linlin.The Status Quo and Countermeasures of Judicial Adjudication of Medical Damage Liability Disputes: Taking Nursing Disputes as Example[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2021,28(10):088.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2021.28.1.24 ]
[7]罗莉殷佳魏伟狄建忠.公立医院优势学科病种绩效管理研究：以骨科为例[J].中国卫生质量管理,2021,28(07):048.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2021.28.7.13 ]
　LUO Li,YIN Jia,WEI Wei.Performance Management of Diseases in Dominant Disciplines in Public Hospitals: Taking Orthopedics Department as an Example[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2021,28(10):048.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2021.28.7.13 ]
[8]邓茜月应娇茜胡云梦李静张丹.死亡病例讨论制度案例分析与策略研究[J].中国卫生质量管理,2022,29(04):033.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.4.09 ]
　DENG Qianyue,YING Jiaoqian,HU Yunmeng.Case Analysis and Strategy Study of Death Case Discussion System[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2022,29(10):033.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.4.09 ]
[9]万辉赵胜兵彭骏曹廷龙柏愚.内镜逆行胰胆管造影术医疗纠纷案件中医疗过错因素与原因力的关系研究[J].中国卫生质量管理,2023,30(05):045.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2023.30.5.10 ]
　WAN Hui,ZHAO Shengbing,PENG Jun.The Relationship between Medical Fault Factors and Causative Potency in Medical Disputes of ERCP[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2023,30(10):045.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2023.30.5.10 ]
[10]刘长英王晓刚王璋郝小丹陈娟林骏.从不良事件角度探析医疗纠纷的影响因素及防控策略[J].中国卫生质量管理,2023,30(10):046.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2023.30.10.11 ]
　LIU Changying,WANG Xiaogang,WANG Zhang.Influencing Factors and Prevention and Control Strategies of Medical Disputes from the Perspective of Adverse Events[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2023,30(10):046.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2023.30.10.11 ]

更新日期/Last Update: 2022-10-28