[1]刘长英王晓刚王璋郝小丹陈娟林骏.从不良事件角度探析医疗纠纷的影响因素及防控策略[J].中国卫生质量管理,2023,30(10):046-50.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2023.30.10.11 ]
 LIU Changying,WANG Xiaogang,WANG Zhang.Influencing Factors and Prevention and Control Strategies of Medical Disputes from the Perspective of Adverse Events[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2023,30(10):046-50.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2023.30.10.11 ]
点击复制

从不良事件角度探析医疗纠纷的影响因素及防控策略
分享到:

《中国卫生质量管理》[ISSN:1006-7515/CN:CN 61-1283/R]

卷:
第30卷
期数:
2023年10期
页码:
046-50
栏目:
患者安全
出版日期:
2023-10-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Influencing Factors and Prevention and Control Strategies of Medical Disputes from the Perspective of Adverse Events
作者:
刘长英王晓刚王璋郝小丹陈娟林骏
中国人民解放军西部战区总医院
Author(s):
LIU ChangyingWANG XiaogangWANG Zhang
General Hospital of the Western Theater Command PLA
关键词:
不良事件医疗纠纷防控策略患者安全
Keywords:
Adverse Events Medical Disputes Prevention and Control Strategy Patient Safety
分类号:
R197
DOI:
10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2023.30.10.11
文献标志码:
B
摘要:
目的从不良事件角度探析医疗纠纷的影响因素及防控策略,为医疗安全管理提供参考。方法抽取某三级综合医院近3年137例不良事件数据,使用SPSS 21.0统计软件分析不良事件分级、成因类型、发生环节、发生科室、当事医务人员性别、患方心理状态等因素对医疗纠纷发生情况的影响。结果137例不良事件中有34例发生医疗纠纷。不同级别不良事件的医疗纠纷发生率存在线性增长趋势(χ2趋势=53.693,P=0.001),一级到三级不良事件较四级不良事件的医疗纠纷发生率更高(P<0.001)。医疗操作环节和诊疗技术引起的不良事件医疗纠纷发生率更高(P<0.05)。外科不良事件较内科不良事件发生医疗纠纷的概率更高(P=0.008)。与女性医务人员相比,涉及男性医务人员的不良事件发生医疗纠纷的概率更大(P=0.007)。不同心理状态的患方不良事件的医疗纠纷发生率存在线性增长趋势(χ2趋势=5.085,P=0.024),患方偏执的不良事件发生医疗纠纷的概率更高(P=0.016)。结论医疗机构应重视高级别不良事件的预防和控制,并从提高医疗技术水平、加强外科科室质量安全管理、营造良好患者安全文化氛围、重视患方心理和社会属性的变化等方面来减少或避免医疗纠纷发生。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo analyze the influencing factors and prevention and control strategies of medical disputes from the perspective of adverse events, so as to provide reference for medical safety management.MethodsData of 137 adverse events in a tertiary general hospital in recent 3 years were collected. SPSS 21.0 software was used to analyze the effects of adverse event classification, cause type, occurrence link, occurrence department, gender of the medical staff involved, psychological state of the patient and other factors on the occurrence of medical disputes. ResultsAmong 137 adverse events, 34 adverse events resulted in medical disputes. The incidence of disputes with different levels of adverse events showed a linear increasing trend (χ2trend=53.693, P=0.001). The dispute rate of level 1 to Level 3 adverse events was higher than that of level 4 adverse events (P<0.001). Adverse events caused by medical operation links and diagnosis and treatment techniques had a higher incidence of medical disputes (P<0.05). Surgical adverse events had a higher probability of disputes than medical adverse events (P=0.008). Adverse events involving male medical staff was more likely to result in disputes than that of female medical staff (P=0.007). Adverse events of patients or family members with different mental states had a linear increase trend in the incidence of medical disputes (χ2trend=5.085,P=0.024). Patients or family members paranoid adverse events had a higher probability of disputes (P=0.016). Conclusion Medical institutions should pay attention to the prevention and control of serious adverse events, and reduce or avoid the occurrence of medical disputes from the aspects of improving the level of medical technology, strengthening the quality and safety management of clinical surgery departments, creating a good patient safety culture atmosphere, and paying attention to the change of psychological and social environment of patients.

参考文献/References:

[1]国家卫生健康委办公厅.关于印发2022年国家医疗质量安全改进目标的通知[EB/OL].(2022-03-01)[2023-02-25].http://www.nhc.gov.cn/yzygj/s3585/202203/ffed3474b1884058841a07c144ad09 4e.shtml. [2]刘鑫,张宝珠.医疗纠纷预防和处理条例理解与适用[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2018:1. [3]黄培,易利华.基于JCI的医疗质量持续改进实践与思考[J].中国卫生质量管理,2016,23(4):1-3,8. [4]方积乾,徐勇勇,陈峰.卫生统计学[M].7版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2012:271-274. [5]王晓刚,谢雪,何睿,等.成都市某两家医院医疗纠纷预测模型构建及评价研究[J].医学与社会,2022,35(7):68-73,80. [6]王海和,钟森,宋宏先,等.我国医疗安全不良事件报告系统现状分析与对策探讨[J].中国卫生质量管理,2014,21(4):26-28. [7]王晓刚,谢雪,何睿,等.基于聚类分析的不良事件类型对医疗纠纷的预测效能研究[J].中国社会医学杂志,2023,40(2):220-224. [8]罗家洪,郭秀华.医学统计学[M].2版.北京:科学出版社,2015:117-124. [9]司法部司法鉴定科学技术研究所,上海市法医学重点实验室.医疗纠纷的鉴定与防范[M].北京:科学出版社,2015:37-42. [10]杨 风,朱俊敏,许艳秋,等.医疗损害纠纷诉讼案件分析:以江苏省为例[J].中国卫生事业管理,2020,37(9):678-682. [11]石镁虹,章桦,杨庆强,等.1825例外科医疗损害责任纠纷分布特征与赔偿分析[J].东南大学学报(医学版),2016,35(3):337-342. [12]吕俏丽,王加充,喻树峰.120例医疗纠纷回顾性分析及防范对策探讨[J].江苏卫生事业管理, 2021(8):1041-1044. [13]蔡梓薇,辛怡,马蔚姝,等.外科医疗损害事件影响因素研究[J].中国卫生质量管理,2019,26(6):111-114. [14]伍琳,许苹,连斌.神经外科医疗风险预警指标研究[J].中国卫生质量管理, 2017, 24(5):17-19. [15]王晓刚,叶本模,刘华英.应用LCSAS和SP评估院内青年医生医患沟通能力的探索[J].中华医学教育探索杂志,2017,16(4):375-380. [16][美]库恩.心理学导论——思想与行为的认识之路[M].郑钢,译.北京:中国轻工业出版社,2007:487-489. [17]李佳宁.性别角色与职业性别刻板印象的关系及其干预研究[D].西安:西北大学,2020. [18]阮氏秋水.成人正颌手术前后的心理特征及满意度的相关性研究[D].南宁:广西医科大学,2016. [19]王大兴,解京明,邓虹,等.退变性腰椎间盘突出术后疗效与术前心理因素的相关性研究[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2011,21(4):312-315. [20]孙刚,薛莲,王努,等.心理评估及干预对提高慢性鼻-鼻窦炎患者鼻内镜手术生存质量的作用[J].重庆医学,2017,46(19):2701-2703.

相似文献/References:

[1]滕苗,肖明朝,吕富荣,等.什么是RCA2[J].中国卫生质量管理,2016,23(02):016.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2016.23.2.06]
[2]袁婷,李欣欣,刘志宇.纸介版与电子版不良事件上报途径对比分析[J].中国卫生质量管理,2016,23(02):042.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2016.23.2.14]
[3]肖定洪,柴维汉,金伟国,等.IHI全过程触发器监测不良事件的应用体会[J].中国卫生质量管理,2016,23(02):044.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2016.23.2.15]
[4]张雪梅,张灵丽,杨帆,等.182份封存病历管理相关问题研究[J].中国卫生质量管理,2016,23(04):034.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2016.23.3.12]
[5]许春红朱诺.门诊不良事件报告对改进门诊管理与服务的作用[J].中国卫生质量管理,2016,23(05):034.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2016.23.5.10]
[6]贾桂丛张采红刘斯文 张燕何路军陈莉刘建辉杨敬芳常缨.血液安全监测文献综述及启示[J].中国卫生质量管理,2016,23(05):084.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2016.23.5.26]
[7]王弓茹 陈英耀*.国外医疗不良事件报告系统研究概述及启示[J].中国卫生质量管理,2016,23(05):113.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2016.23.5.35]
[8]王宏斌郑新瑞张珊红*刘维安书杰王东光.非计划二次手术质控策略探讨[J].中国卫生质量管理,2017,24(02):034.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2017.24.2.11]
[9]陈敏 王宏斌 刘晓雷.某院不良事件上报情况分析[J].中国卫生质量管理,2017,24(03):043.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2017.24.3.15]
[10]薛小静 杨小林 谭君.降低老年慢性病患者出院后非医源性不良事件发生率[J].中国卫生质量管理,2017,24(03):074.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2017.24.3.25]

更新日期/Last Update: 2023-10-15