[1]张永芳吴永明王胜男王遥谭燕姜安琪刘国娥潘速跃.广东省脑死亡质控数据回顾分析及策略探讨[J].中国卫生质量管理,2022,29(03):15-17.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.3.05 ]
　ZHANG Yongfang,WU Yongming,WANG Shengnan.Retrospective Analysis and Strategy Discussion on Quality Control Data of Brain Death in Guangdong Province[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2022,29(03):15-17.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.3.05 ]

点击复制

广东省脑死亡质控数据回顾分析及策略探讨

《中国卫生质量管理》[ISSN:1006-7515/CN:CN 61-1283/R] 卷: 第29卷期数: 2022年03期页码: 15-17 栏目: 特别关注出版日期: 2022-03-28

Title:: Retrospective Analysis and Strategy Discussion on Quality Control Data of Brain Death in Guangdong Province

作者:: 张永芳吴永明王胜男王遥谭燕姜安琪刘国娥潘速跃; 南方医科大学南方医院/广东省脑损害评估质量控制中心

Author(s):: ZHANG Yongfang; WU Yongming; WANG Shengnan; Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University/Guangdong Center for Brain Injury Assessment and Quality Control,Guangzhou

关键词:: 脑死亡判定; 病例质控; 质控管理; 质控策略

Keywords:: Brain Death Determination; Quality Control of Case; Quality Control Management; Quality Control Strategy

分类号:: R197.323；R741

DOI:: 10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.3.05

文献标志码:: A

摘要:: 目的探讨大体量脑死亡病例质控策略，促进脑死亡判定工作规范化。方法从国家脑死亡判定质控信息平台提取相关数据，回顾性分析2013年—2020年广东省脑损害评估质量控制中心脑死亡判定工作量及质控相关指标。结果广东省中心脑死亡判定质控体量呈增长趋势。2020年广东省中心质控病例数为52.05%。2017年—2020年广东省质控中心临床评估符合率从0提升至97.18%，自主呼吸激发试验实施率从23.08%提升至98.50%，脑电图评估符合率从26.67%提升至99.26%，短潜伏期体感诱发电位评估符合率从30.77%提升至99.24%，经颅多普勒超声评估符合率为57.14%～61.63%，两项确认试验覆盖率为93.33%～99.58%。结论广东省脑死亡病例质控体量逐年增长。质控工作需要质控人员专职化，质控系统信息化，质控管理精细化，以进一步提高大体量脑死亡病例质控效率和质量。

Abstract:: ObjectiveTo explore the quality control strategy of large numbers of brain death cases and promote the standardization of brain death determination.MethodsRelevant data were extracted from the national brain death determination quality control network system, and the workload of brain death determination and quality control indexes of Guangdong Center for Brain Injury Assessment and Quality Control from 2013 to 2020 were retrospectively analyzed.ResultsThe quality control volume of brain death determination of Guangdong provincial center showed an overall increasing trend. In 2020, the number of quality control cases in Guangdong provincial center was 52.05%. From 2017 to 2020, the compliance rate of clinical evaluation in Guangdong provincial center increased from 0% to 97.18%, the implementation rate of opnea test increased from 23.08% to 98.50%, and the compliance rate of electroencephalography assessment increased from 26.67% to 99.26%. The coincidence rate of short latency somatosensory evoked potentials assessment was increased from 30.77% to 99.24%, and the coincidence rate of transcranial doppler ultrasound assessment was 57.14%~61.63%.The coverage rate of the two confirmed tests was 93.33%～99.58%. Conclusion The volume of quality control of brain death cases has increased in Guangdong Province. It is suggested to establish full-time quality control team, strengthen information construction of quality control system and improve quality control management system, so as to further improve the efficiency and quality of quality control of general brain death cases.

参考文献/References:

［1］黄江云，方娟. 挂靠质控中心现状分析及建议［J］.中国卫生质量管理,2019,26(6):52-55. ［2］国家卫生和计划生育委员会脑损伤质控评价中心. 脑死亡判定标准与技术规范(成人质控版)［J］.中华神经科杂志,2013,46(9):637-640. ［3］国家卫生健康委员会脑损伤质控评价中心，中华医学会神经病学分会神经重症协作组，中国医师协会神经内科医师分会神经重症专业委员会. 中国成人脑死亡判定标准与操作规范(第二版)［J］.中华医学杂志,2019,99(17):1288-1292. ［4］宿英英. 中国脑死亡判定现状与推进［J］.中华医学杂志,2021,101(23):1721-1724. ［5］齐华英，冯学泉，刘迪，等. 脑损伤质控评价(脑死亡判定)分中心的建立与管理［J］.实用器官移植电子杂志,2016,4(3):180-182. ［6］杨秋凤，乔西民，叱干潇斐，等. 基于“大质控”理念的质量管理探索［J］.中国卫生质量管理,2021,28(4):37-38，46. ［7］张春华，钟华，郗晓婧，等. 如何提高质控中心的管理效能［J］.中国卫生质量管理,2021,28(2):23-25. ［8］孙蓉蓉，陈伟，徐明娜，等. 某省级医疗质量控制中心质控实践与讨论［J］.中国卫生质量管理,2017,24(5):28-31. ［9］杨国胜，李晓洁. 北京市心血管介入质量控制和改进中心管理模式探讨［J］.中国医院管理,2010,30(2):33-34.

相似文献/References:

[1]宿英英.脑死亡判定质控工作思考与策略[J].中国卫生质量管理,2022,29(03):1.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.3.01 ]
　SU Yingying.Thinking and Strategy of Quality Control of Brain Death Determination[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2022,29(03):1.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.3.01 ]
[2]宿英英刘刚张艳陈卫碧田飞范琳琳俞越黄丹赵国光.脑死亡判定质控指标的建立与应用[J].中国卫生质量管理,2022,29(03):4.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.3.02 ]
　SU Yingying.Establishment and Application of Quality Control Index for Brain Death Determination[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2022,29(03):4.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.3.02 ]
[3]刘刚宿英英陈忠云黄荟瑾费晓璐魏岚梁志刚赵国光.脑死亡判定质量控制信息平台建设与应用[J].中国卫生质量管理,2022,29(03):7.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.3.03 ]
　LIU Gang,SU Yingying,CHEN Zhongyun.Construction and Application of Brain Death Determination Quality Control Information Platform[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2022,29(03):7.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.3.03 ]
[4]张萍许峰连立飞梁奇明朱文浩朱遂强王芙蓉.以医院为基本单元的脑死亡判定质控团队建设[J].中国卫生质量管理,2022,29(03):11.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.3.04 ]
　ZHANG Ping,XU Feng,LIAN Lifei.Construction of the Quality Control Team for Brain Death Determination Based on Hospital[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2022,29(03):11.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.3.04 ]
[5]邓燕君邓卫康刘琦王俊代陆露徐平.贵州省脑死亡判定确认试验技术质控分析与改进[J].中国卫生质量管理,2022,29(03):18.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.3.06 ]
　DENG Yanjun,DENG Weikang,LIU Qi.Quality Control Analysis and Improvement of Brain Death Determination Confirmation Test Technology in Guizhou Province[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2022,29(03):18.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.3.06 ]
[6]李文臣孙奥钟铁锴王海峰.吉林省脑死亡判定自主呼吸激发试验的实施率和完成率分析[J].中国卫生质量管理,2022,29(03):22.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.3.07 ]
　LI Wenchen,SUN Ao,ZHONG Tiekai.Analysis of Implementation Rate and Completion Rate of Apnea Test in Brain Death Determination in Jilin Province[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2022,29(03):22.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.3.07 ]
[7]宿英英刘刚钱素云武洁张永芳邓燕君黄丹俞越荆婧刘海静党辉黄荟瑾赵国光.脑死亡判定精细化质控管理规范（2022版）[J].中国卫生质量管理,2022,29(12):23.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.12.06 ]
　SU Yingying,LIU Gang,QIAN Suyun.Refined Quality Control Management Specification for Brain Death Determination (2022)[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2022,29(03):23.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.12.06 ]

更新日期/Last Update: 2022-03-28