[1]邓燕君邓卫康刘琦王俊代陆露徐平.贵州省脑死亡判定确认试验技术质控分析与改进[J].中国卫生质量管理,2022,29(03):018-21.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.3.06 ]
　DENG Yanjun,DENG Weikang,LIU Qi.Quality Control Analysis and Improvement of Brain Death Determination Confirmation Test Technology in Guizhou Province[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2022,29(03):018-21.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.3.06 ]
点击复制

贵州省脑死亡判定确认试验技术质控分析与改进
分享到：

《中国卫生质量管理》[ISSN:1006-7515/CN:CN 61-1283/R]

卷:
第29卷
期数:
2022年03期
页码:
018-21
栏目:
特别关注
出版日期:
2022-03-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
Quality Control Analysis and Improvement of Brain Death Determination Confirmation Test Technology in Guizhou Province
作者:
邓燕君邓卫康刘琦王俊代陆露徐平
遵义医科大学附属医院
Author(s):
DENG Yanjun; DENG Weikang; LIU Qi
Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University
关键词:
脑死亡判定; 确认试验技术; 质量控制; 技术改进
Keywords:
Brain Death Determination;  Confirm Test Technique;  Quality Control;  Technical Improvement
分类号:
R197.323；R741
DOI:
10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.3.06
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的对贵州省脑死亡判定确认试验技术质控情况进行分析，针对性提出改进建议。方法对2016年1月—2021年9月贵州省3家示范医院提交的333例脑死亡病例三项确认试验技术指标进行比较分析，依据标准进行确认试验技术质控。结果3家医院脑电图评估实施率均达90%以上，两家医院经颅多普勒超声评估实施率均达90%以上，1家医院短潜伏期体感诱发电位评估实施率达94.59%。两项确认试验符合率分别为93.85%、92.57%和100.00%。经脑死亡病例质控发现的问题分为专业技术问题和非专业技术问题。结论从质控措施和试验技术两方面针对性改进，可提高确认试验规范性和准确性，为脑死亡判定提供客观依据。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo analyze the quality control of brain death determination confirmation test technology in Guizhou Province to put forward corresponding improvement suggestions.MethodsFrom January 2016 to September 2021, 333 brain death cases from three demonstration hospitals in Guizhou Province were compared and analyzed in terms of technical indexes of three confirmation tests, and the quality control of confirmation tests was carried out according to the standards.ResultsThe application rate of electroencephalogram (EEG) assessment in the three hospitals was above 90%, the application rate of transcranial doppler ultrasound assessment in two hospitals was above 90%, and the application rate of short latency somatosensory evoked potentials assessment in one hospital was 94.59%. The concordance rate of the two confirmed tests were 93.85%, 92.57% and 100%, respectively. The problems found by quality control of brain death cases couid be divided into professional technical problems and non-professional technical problems.Conclusion The improvement of quality control measures and test technology can improve the standardization and accuracy of confirmation test, provide objective basis for the brain death determination.

参考文献/References:

［1］王 巍,马丽平,陈 晔.我国医院持续改进研究的可视化分析［J］.中国卫生质量管理,2021,28(4):25-28. ［2］马旭东.我国医疗质量安全不良事件分类的思考［J］.中国卫生质量管理,2021,28(6):46-50. ［3］国家卫生健康委员会脑损伤质控评价中心,中华医学会神经病学分会神经重症协作组,中国医师协会神经内科医师分会神经重症专业委员会.中国成人脑死亡判定标准与操作规范(第二版)［J］.中华医学杂志,2019,99(17):1288-1292. ［4］国家卫生和计划生育委员会脑损伤质控评价中心.脑死亡判定标准与技术规范(成人质控版)［J］.中华神经科杂志,2013,46(9):637-640. ［5］刘晓燕.临床脑电图学［M］.2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2006:194-197. ［6］国家卫生健康委员会脑损伤质控评价中心,中华医学会神经病学分会神经重症协作组,中国医师协会神经内科医师分会神经重症专业委员会.脑死亡判定标准与操作规范：专家补充意见（2021）［J］.中华医学杂志,2021,101(23):1758-1765. ［7］宿英英,叶红，王琳，等.我国脑死亡判定标准的可行性研究及建议［J］.中国脑血管病杂志,2008,5(12):531-535. ［8］Greer DM, Shemie SD,Lewis A,et al. Determination of brain death/death by neurologic criteria:the world brain death project［J］.JAMA,2020,324(11):1078-1097. ［9］Su YY,Chen WB,Liu G,et al. An investigation and suggestions for the improvement of brain death determination in China［J］.Chin Med J(Engl),2018,131(24):2910-2914. ［10］徐乐,陈飞,苏皖.大数据在医疗质量管理中的应用研究［J］.中国卫生质量管理,2020,27(2):78-80,83.

相似文献/References:

[1]宿英英.脑死亡判定质控工作思考与策略[J].中国卫生质量管理,2022,29(03):001.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.3.01 ]
　SU Yingying.Thinking and Strategy of Quality Control of Brain Death Determination[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2022,29(03):001.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.3.01 ]
[2]宿英英刘刚张艳陈卫碧田飞范琳琳俞越黄丹赵国光.脑死亡判定质控指标的建立与应用[J].中国卫生质量管理,2022,29(03):004.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.3.02 ]
　SU Yingying.Establishment and Application of Quality Control Index for Brain Death Determination[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2022,29(03):004.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.3.02 ]
[3]刘刚宿英英陈忠云黄荟瑾费晓璐魏岚梁志刚赵国光.脑死亡判定质量控制信息平台建设与应用[J].中国卫生质量管理,2022,29(03):007.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.3.03 ]
　LIU Gang,SU Yingying,CHEN Zhongyun.Construction and Application of Brain Death Determination Quality Control Information Platform[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2022,29(03):007.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.3.03 ]
[4]张萍许峰连立飞梁奇明朱文浩朱遂强王芙蓉.以医院为基本单元的脑死亡判定质控团队建设[J].中国卫生质量管理,2022,29(03):011.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.3.04 ]
　ZHANG Ping,XU Feng,LIAN Lifei.Construction of the Quality Control Team for Brain Death Determination Based on Hospital[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2022,29(03):011.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.3.04 ]
[5]张永芳吴永明王胜男王遥谭燕姜安琪刘国娥潘速跃.广东省脑死亡质控数据回顾分析及策略探讨[J].中国卫生质量管理,2022,29(03):015.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.3.05 ]
　ZHANG Yongfang,WU Yongming,WANG Shengnan.Retrospective Analysis and Strategy Discussion on Quality Control Data of Brain Death in Guangdong Province[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2022,29(03):015.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.3.05 ]
[6]李文臣 孙奥 钟铁锴 王海峰.吉林省脑死亡判定自主呼吸激发试验的实施率和完成率分析[J].中国卫生质量管理,2022,29(03):022.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.3.07 ]
　LI Wenchen,SUN Ao,ZHONG Tiekai.Analysis of Implementation Rate and Completion Rate of Apnea Test in Brain Death Determination in Jilin Province[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2022,29(03):022.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.3.07 ]
[7]宿英英刘刚钱素云武洁张永芳邓燕君黄丹俞越荆婧刘海静党辉黄荟瑾赵国光.脑死亡判定精细化质控管理规范（2022版）[J].中国卫生质量管理,2022,29(12):023.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.12.06 ]
　SU Yingying,LIU Gang,QIAN Suyun.Refined Quality Control Management Specification for Brain Death Determination (2022)[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2022,29(03):023.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.12.06 ]

更新日期/Last Update: 2022-03-28