[1]胡靖琛詹丽英李煜张媛媛.利用DRG和加权秩和比法评价麻醉医师绩效[J].中国卫生质量管理,2021,28(07):55-57.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2021.28.7.15 ]
　HU Jingchen,ZHAN Liying,LI Yu.Performance Evaluation of Anesthesiologists Based on DRG and Weighted Rank-Sum Ratio[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2021,28(07):55-57.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2021.28.7.15 ]

点击复制

利用DRG和加权秩和比法评价麻醉医师绩效

《中国卫生质量管理》[ISSN:1006-7515/CN:CN 61-1283/R] 卷: 第28卷期数: 2021年07期页码: 55-57 栏目: 关注DRG 出版日期: 2021-07-28

Title:: Performance Evaluation of Anesthesiologists Based on DRG and Weighted Rank-Sum Ratio

作者:: 胡靖琛詹丽英李煜张媛媛; 武汉大学人民医院

Author(s):: HU Jingchen; ZHAN Liying; LI Yu; Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University

关键词:: 疾病诊断相关分组（DRG）; 加权秩和比法; 麻醉医师; 绩效评价

Keywords:: Diagnosis Related Groups (DRG); Weight Rank-Sum Ratio; Anesthesiologist; Performance Evaluation

分类号:: R197.32；R614

DOI:: 10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2021.28.7.15

文献标志码:: A

摘要:: 目的探索建立一套科学的麻醉医师绩效评价体系，为麻醉医师绩效考核提供参考。方法提取湖北省某三甲医院2019年出院患者病案首页数据，通过手术麻醉管理系统和电子病历系统完善麻醉信息，利用CN-DRG分组器获取 DRG指标，从医院内部OA系统获得麻醉医师信息，采用加权秩和比法对麻醉医师进行绩效评价。结果116名麻醉医师中，19人分为优档，79人分为中档，18人分为差档。3档间差异有统计学意义（F=161.967，P<0.001）。结论该麻醉医师绩效评价体系较为合理、客观，能够有效评价麻醉医师劳动付出，其评价结果可为麻醉科绩效考核、学科建设和精细化管理提供依据。

Abstract:: ObjectiveTo explore and establish a scientific anesthesiologist performance evaluation system and provide a reference for the performance appraisal.MethodsThe home page data of discharged patients' medical records in 2019 in a tertiary hospital in Hubei Province was extracted. The anesthesia relevant information was improved through the electronic medical record system and surgical anesthesia management system. The "CN-DRG" burster was used to obtained the DRG indicators and the staff information was obtained from the Office Automation system. The weighted rank-sum ratio method was applied to evaluate the performance of anesthesiologists.ResultsAmong 116 anesthesiologists, 19, 79, and 18 anesthesiologists were divided into three grades: excellent, medium and bad with statistical significance (F=161.967, P<0.001).Conclusion The performance evaluation system of anesthesiologists was objective and scientific. It could effectively evaluate the labor effort of anesthesiologists and the evaluation results could provide reference for the performance assessment, discipline construction and fine management of Anesthesiology Department.

参考文献/References:

［1］徐崇国.公立医院麻醉科绩效评价模式的探讨［J］.安徽医学,2012,33(8):1098-1100. ［2］杨宏伟,边维娜,丁涛,等.DRGs在汉中市综合医院医疗质量评价中的应用［J］.中国卫生质量管理,2019,26(1):36-38. ［3］马莎,俞群俊,陆烨,等.基于DRGs的某市三级综合医院绩效评价分析［J］.中国卫生质量管理,2019,26(4):13-15. ［4］明平勇,柯珊红.DRGs在学科精准管理中的应用［J］.中国卫生质量管理,2019,26(Z1):38-41. ［5］国家卫生健康委员会医政医管局.CN-DRG分组方案(2018版)［M］.北京:北京大学医学出版社, 2019:1-3. ［6］胡靖琛,李煜,刘明孝.基于DRGs指标评估临床医师专业技术能力初探［J］.中华医院管理杂志,2019,35(5):372-375. ［7］徐天和. 中华医学统计百科全书:管理与健康统计分册［M］.北京:中国统计出版社, 2013:179-182. ［8］孙振球，徐勇勇.医学统计学［M］.4版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2014:419-421. ［9］张彤,包全堂,王玉芳.原创麻醉科绩效管理［J］.中国医院院长,2015(12):80-81. ［10］崔苏扬.老年病人围手术期风险与处理［J］.实用老年医学,2012,26(1):3-9. ［11］吴秀英,杜英杰.小儿不是成人的缩影:关注小儿麻醉诱导期安全与舒适［J］.医学与哲学(B),2016,37(5):24-26. ［12］尚冬青.老年患者急诊手术麻醉的安全性［J］.中国老年学杂志,2014,34(23):6806-6807.

相似文献/References:

[1]胡靖琛李煜刘明孝马宗奎程羿嘉张媛媛.基于DRG的主诊组医疗服务能力综合评价[J].中国卫生质量管理,2022,29(04):25.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.4.07 ]
　HU Jingchen,LI Yu,LIU Mingxiao.Comprehensive Evaluation of Medical Service Capability among Attending Physician Groups Based on DRG[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2022,29(07):25.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.4.07 ]
[2]张青王兴龙江许烨勍谢飞.精神卫生服务医保混合支付方式改革现状及可行性探讨[J].中国卫生质量管理,2025,32(08):44.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2025.32.8.10]
　ZHANG Qing,WANG Xing,LONG Jiang.Exploration of the Current Status and Feasibility of Reforming the Mixed Payment Methods for Medical Insurance in Mental Health Services[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2025,32(07):44.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2025.32.8.10]

更新日期/Last Update: 2021-07-28