《中国卫生质量管理》[ISSN:1006-7515/CN:CN 61-1283/R]
卷:
第26卷
期数:
2019年02期
页码:
36-39
栏目:
医疗质量
出版日期:
2019-03-28
- 作者:
-
王颖倩 汤小波 何纪毅 陈翀 张文砚 吴巍巍 郭明和 杨锦锦 武剑
-
清华大学附属北京清华长庚医院
- 关键词:
-
疾病诊断相关分组（DRGs）; 主诊医师; 医疗质量
- Keywords:
-
Diagnosis Related Groups(DRGs); Attending Physician; Medical Quality
- DOI:
-
10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2019.26.2.12
- 摘要:
-
目的基于DRGs分组平台对主诊医师团队的医疗服务水平进行评价，探索以DRGs平台数据为工具，评价临床医师团队医疗质量。方法利用DRGs的评价指标，运用综合指数法，从医疗能力、医疗效率和医疗安全3个方面对样本医院肝胆胰外科主诊医师团队的医疗质量进行评价，并进行比较分析。结果综合评价排名前3的医师团队分别是F、E、C，排名后两位为B、D。其中医疗能力的分值B、C、D团队较低，建议提高专业技能，增加疾病收治种类，提高疑难杂症病例的诊治能力；医疗效率D、G团队分值较低，建议在保证医疗质量的前提下适量减少住院日，选择更经济的治疗方法降低医疗费用。结论基于DRGs绩效评价指标，构建主诊医师团队医疗质量评价架构，能真实反映医师团队的医疗质量情况。
- Abstract:
-
ObjectiveTo evaluate the medical services of attending physician team based on the DRGs grouping platform, and the DRGs platform data was used as a tool to evaluate the medical quality from the level of the clinician team.MethodsUsing the evaluation index of DRGs, the comprehensive index method was used to evaluate and rank the medical quality of the chief physician team of the hospital's hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery from three aspects including medical ability, medical efficiency and medical safety.ResultsThe top 3 physician teams in the comprehensive evaluation were F, E and C, and the last 2 were B and D. Among them, the scores of medical ability scores B, C, and D were lower. It was recommended to improve professional skills, increase the types diseases of patients, and improve the ability to treat and solve incurable cases. The medical efficiency D and G team scores were low. Under the premise of ensuring the quality of medical care, it was recommended to reduce the hospitalization day and choose a more economical treatment to reduce medical expenses.Conclusion Based on the indicators of the DRGs performance evaluation platform, the medical quality evaluation framework of the attending physician team can be constructed to truly reflect the medical quality of the physician team.
参考文献/References:
［1］邓小虹.北京DRGs系统的研究与应用［D］.2015.
相似文献/References:
[1]朱晓伟 陈璐 王凤梅.DRGs在医院重点学科管理中的应用[J].中国卫生质量管理,2018,25(02):20.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2018.25.2.06]
[2]陶成琳 陈妍 林德南 刘建华.DRGs风险分析及对深圳市试点工作的启示[J].中国卫生质量管理,2019,26(02):31.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2019.26.2.11]
[3]邢晨伟王清江盛伟琪.基于多层神经网络算法的主诊医师岗位核定研究[J].中国卫生质量管理,2022,29(04):46.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.4.13
]
XING Chenwei,WANG Qingjiang,SHENG Weiqi.Post Verification of Attending Physician Based on Multilayer Neural Network Algorithm[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2022,29(02):46.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.4.13
]
[4]张振于志一李江峰崔楠丁磊蒋光峰.基于熵权-TOPSIS-RSR联合法的临床科室DRGs绩效综合评价研究[J].中国卫生质量管理,2023,30(07):38.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2023.30.7.09
]
ZHANG Zhen,YU Zhiyi,LI Jiangfeng.Comprehensive Evaluation of DRGs Performance in Clinical Departments Based on Entropy Weight-TOPSIS-RSR Joint Method[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2023,30(02):38.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2023.30.7.09
]
更新日期/Last Update:
2019-03-28
