[1]颜芬芬 王道雄 韩宝江.医用耗材管控成效研究:基于每权重耗材费用考核指标[J].中国卫生质量管理,2025,32(03):054-58.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2025.32.3.11]
 YAN Fenfen,WANG Daoxiong,HAN Baojiang.Study on the Effectiveness of Medical Consumables Management and Control : Based on the Assessment Index of Consumables Cost per Weight[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2025,32(03):054-58.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2025.32.3.11]
点击复制

医用耗材管控成效研究:基于每权重耗材费用考核指标()
分享到:

《中国卫生质量管理》[ISSN:1006-7515/CN:CN 61-1283/R]

卷:
第32卷
期数:
2025年03期
页码:
054-58
栏目:
绩效管理与医院高质量发展
出版日期:
2025-03-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Study on the Effectiveness of Medical Consumables Management and Control : Based on the Assessment Index of Consumables Cost per Weight
作者:
颜芬芬 王道雄 韩宝江
华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院
Author(s):
YAN Fenfen WANG Daoxiong HAN Baojiang
Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science & Technology
关键词:
每权重耗材费用DRG耗材管控医疗服务能力
Keywords:
Cost of Consumables per Weight DRG Consumables Management and Control Medical Service Ability
分类号:
R197.323
DOI:
10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2025.32.3.11
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的分析以每权重耗材费用为考核指标对医用耗材管控效果以及对医疗服务水平的影响。方法选取某三甲医院2022年以及2023年4月-2024年3月病历数据,采用SPSS 20.0软件对考核前后相关指标变化进行分析。采用CRITIC权重法及TOPSIS法评价科室医疗服务水平。采用斯皮尔曼相关系数法对每权重耗材费用与评价指标相关性进行检验。结果每权重耗材费用、DRG组数、平均耗材费用、平均住院费用的平均值均降低,数据较考核前差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);科室CMI值、DRG总权重、四级手术占比平均值均提升,数据较考核前差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。部分科室医疗服务水平排名上升。每权重耗材费用与平均耗材费用和四级手术占比相关性较强。结论基于每权重耗材费用的考核机制可有效促进科室医疗服务水平提升。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo analyze the effect of consumables cost per weight as an assessment index on the control effect of medical consumables and its impact on medical service level. MethodsThe medical record data of a tertiary hospital in 2022 and from April 2023 to March 2024 were selected. SPSS 20.0 software was used to analyze the changes of relevant indicators before and after the assessment. The CRITIC weight method and TOPSIS method were used to evaluate the medical service level of the departments. The Spearman correlation coefficient method was used to test the correlation between the cost of consumables per weight and the evaluation index. ResultsThe cost of consumables per weight, DRG group number, average consumables cost and average hospitalization cost all decreased, and the differences in the data were statistically significant compared with those before the assessment (P<0.05). The CMI value, total DRG weight and the average proportion of four-level surgery in the department all improved, and the differences in the data were significantly different from those before the assessment (P<0.05). The ranking of medical service level of some departments increased. The cost of consumables per weight has a strong correlation with the average cost of consumables and the proportion of four-level surgery.Conclusion The assessment mechanism based on the cost of consumables per weight can effectively promote the improvement of medical service level.

参考文献/References:

[1]李婵,邹佳,徐焦,等.DRG相对权重调整的思考和启示[J].卫生经济研究,2023,40(1):46-48,52.[2]向华,刘学思,杨利,等.基于CN-DRG平台的医用耗材费用分析研究:以重庆市某医院为例[J].医疗卫生装备,2021,42(9):74-77,82.[3]罗礼生,郑伟.DRGs数据分析在公立医院综合绩效评价中的应用[J].中国医院管理,2019,39(1):47-49.[4]接纯纯,周典,田帝,等.基于DRG和综合指数法的住院患者医疗服务绩效评价[J].中国医院管理,2022,42(10):27-30.[5]杜宝贵,陈磊.科技服务业助推中国经济高质量发展的影响因素和优化路径研究:基于GRA模型与CRITIC权重法的综合分析[J].科技管理研究,2022,42(9):91-98.[6]于群,霍筱东,何剑,等.基于斯皮尔曼相关系数和系统惯量的中国电网停电事故趋势预测[J].中国电机工程学报,2023,43(14):5372-5381.[7]国家卫生计生委,国家发展改革委,财政部,等.关于印发控制公立医院医疗费用不合理增长的若干意见的通知:国卫体改发〔2015〕89号[EB/OL].(2015-11-06)[2024-06-20].https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2015-11/11/content_5007031.htm.[8]国家卫生健康委办公厅.关于采集二级和三级公立医院2019年度绩效考核数据有关工作的通知:国卫办医函〔2020〕438号[EB/OL].(2020-06-09)[2024-06-20].http://www.nhc.gov.cn/yzygj/s7659/202006/7912483be2784e2ca08a9ea4628369b 8.shtml.[9]赖凤郭,赖妍,王也方.医保支付方式改革背景下作业成本法在公立医院成本管理中的应用[J].中国医院管理,2023,43(9):47-52.[10]颜芬芬,韩宝江,王道雄.医用耗材大数据平台的设计与实现[J].中国卫生信息管理杂志,2024,21(1):129-134.[11]王亦冬,孙志楠,陈颖.典型国家DRG研究与实践进展综述及其对我国的启示[J].中国卫生经济,2021,40(6):91-96.[12]王兴强,周振宇,徐茂云.基于院级DRG分组诊疗数据知识库的实时分组管理研究[J].中国卫生质量管理,2023,30(5):51-54.[13]姚月宁,鲍伟,董四平,等.基于适宜技术理论的双DRG绩效管理模式探究[J].中国卫生质量管理,2024,31(4):73-77.

相似文献/References:

[1]李刚刘继红胡春平罗博特.通过DRG探析男科学发展路径[J].中国卫生质量管理,2021,28(06):043.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2021.28.6.12 ]
 LI Gang,LIU Jihong,HU Chunping.Exploring the Development Path of Andrology through DRG[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2021,28(03):043.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2021.28.6.12 ]
[2]董乾王富敏刘厚福房耘耘.DRG对住院费用与服务的影响及建议[J].中国卫生质量管理,2021,28(12):022.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2021.28.12.07 ]
 DONG Qian,WANG Fumin,LIU Houfu.The Impact of DRG on Hospitalization Costs and Services and Recommendations[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2021,28(03):022.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2021.28.12.07 ]
[3]范晓琪宋多王智帆管宏才李乔晟简伟研王岩.DRG付费对医生行为和医疗质量的影响研究:以踝关节和脊柱融合术为例[J].中国卫生质量管理,2022,29(08):046.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.8.11 ]
 FAN Xiaoqi,SONG Duo,WANG Zhifan.Impact of DRG Reform on Doctors' Behaviors and Medical Quality: Taking Ankle and Spinal Arthrodesis as Examples[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2022,29(03):046.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.8.11 ]
[4]吴镝娅张丽华刘艳蔡林.基于DRG的公立医院精细化成本管控实践探讨[J].中国卫生质量管理,2023,30(01):039.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2023.30.1.10 ]
 WU Diya,ZHANG Lihua,LIU Yan.Practice of Lean Cost Control in Public Hospitals Based on Diagnosis Related Group[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2023,30(03):039.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2023.30.1.10 ]
[5]方金鸣陶红兵.基于博弈理论的DRG支付对三级医院疾病诊治难度的影响分析[J].中国卫生质量管理,2023,30(07):024.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2023.30.7.06 ]
 FANG Jinming,TAO Hongbing.Influence of DRG Payment on the Difficulty of Diagnosis and Treatment of Diseases in Tertiary Hospitals Based on Game Theory[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2023,30(03):024.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2023.30.7.06 ]
[6]朱慧吴俊霞.某传染病专科医院临床科室医疗服务能力评价与分析[J].中国卫生质量管理,2023,30(08):030.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2023.30.8.07 ]
 ZHU Hui,WU Junxia.Evaluation and Analysis of Medical Service Capability of Clinical Departments in a Certain Infectious Disease Specialized Hospital[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2023,30(03):030.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2023.30.8.07 ]
[7]何琼刘晨红.DRG支付改革形势下的医疗服务行为持续改进[J].中国卫生质量管理,2023,30(08):068.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2023.30.8.14 ]
 HE Qiong,LIU Chenhong.Continuous Improvement in Health Care Practice in the context of DRG Payment Reform[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2023,30(03):068.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2023.30.8.14 ]
[8]刘颜张海峤陈寒杰靳洁孙逸凡林创鹏汤鑫徐源许昌陈芸.基于电子病历的智慧医保探讨[J].中国卫生质量管理,2023,30(10):015.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2023.30.10.04 ]
 LIU Yan,ZHANG Hanqiao,CHEN Hanjie.Exploration of Smart Medical Insurance Based on Electronic Medical Records[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2023,30(03):015.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2023.30.10.04 ]
[9]魏巍孙明徐茂云.DRG支付下IF55病种医用耗材应用现状与对策研究[J].中国卫生质量管理,2023,30(12):028.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2023.30.12.07 ]
 WEI Wei,SUN Ming,XU Maoyun.Application Status and Countermeasures of IF55 Medical Consumables under DRG Payment[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2023,30(03):028.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2023.30.12.07 ]
[10]沈婷于海跃钟力炜朱佳云张娴静李群朱乐兰.临床专科评价的DRG细化分组机制研究[J].中国卫生质量管理,2024,31(03):012.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2024.31.3.04]
 SHEN Ting,YU Haiyue,ZHONG Liwei.DRG Refinement Grouping Mechanism of Clinical Specialty Departments Evaluation[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2024,31(03):012.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2024.31.3.04]

更新日期/Last Update: 2025-03-15