PDF下载

[1]陈嘉泳黎明周贵阳鲁倩关伟麟.我国援外医疗队传染病防治培训现状与策略分析[J].中国卫生质量管理,2025,32(12):91-96.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2025.32.12.18]
　CHEN Jiayong,LI Ming,ZHOU Guiyang.Analysis of the Current Status and Strategies for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control Training Among China’s Foreign Aid Medical Teams[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2025,32(12):91-96.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2025.32.12.18]

点击复制

我国援外医疗队传染病防治培训现状与策略分析

《中国卫生质量管理》[ISSN:1006-7515/CN:CN 61-1283/R] 卷: 32 期数: 2025年12期页码: 91-96 栏目: 问题与探索出版日期: 2025-12-15

Title:: Analysis of the Current Status and Strategies for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control Training Among China’s Foreign Aid Medical Teams

作者:: 陈嘉泳黎明周贵阳鲁倩关伟麟; 广东省卫生健康委员会事务中心

Author(s):: CHEN Jiayong; LI Ming; ZHOU Guiyang; The Goverment Affairs Center of Health Commission of Guangdong Province

关键词:: 对外援助; 援外医疗队员; 传染病; 培训需求; 培训对策

Keywords:: Foreign Aid; Foreign Aid Medical Team Members; Infectious Diseases; Training Needs; Training Strategies

分类号:: R197.323

DOI:: 10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2025.32.12.18

文献标志码:: A

摘要:: 目的了解援外医疗队传染病防治培训的现状和问题，为优化培训机制、提高队员传染病防控能力提供科学依据和建议。方法采用问卷调查法，对2024年参加出国前培训的援外医疗队员进行调查，了解队员基本信息和传染病防治培训现状，并对培训效果进行单因素和多因素Logistic分析，了解其影响因素。结果传染病作为援外医疗队员的主要担忧因素之一，其与培训消除顾虑的效果呈显著负相关（OR=0.11，P=0.003）。培训干预措施中，是否为医务人员（OR=6.59，P=0.005）、培训后发放课件或防治手册（OR=4.93，P=0.011）以及承派省份传染病防治宣教工作到位（OR=22.73，P=0.001）均显著提升了培训效果。在传染病防控能力提升方面，医疗队制订传染病防治预案（OR=15.81，P<0.001）和承派省份宣教工作到位（OR=71.94，P<0.001）展现出极强的促进作用。然而，培训后队员主动搜集传染病知识的行为与能力提升呈负相关（OR=0.04，P=0.039）。结论未来的援外医疗队传染病防治培训体系应从培训内容、培训方式、应急预案和宣教工作等方面进行全面优化。通过完善培训内容、增强培训方式的多样性与实用性、制订传染病防治预案以及构建“承派省-受援国”双轨联动的宣教体系，全面提升援外医疗队员的传染病防控能力，确保其在援外工作中能够有效应对各类传染病风险，为受援国的医疗卫生事业作出更大贡献。

Abstract:: ObjectiveTo understand the current status and issues of infectious disease prevention and control training for foreign aid medical teams, and to provide scientific evidence and recommendations for optimizing training mechanisms and enhancing team members’ ability to prevent and control infectious diseases.MethodsA questionnaire survey was conducted among members of foreign aid medical teams who participated in pre-departure training in 2024. The survey aimed to gather basic information about the team members and the current status of infectious disease prevention and control training. Additionally, single-factor and multi-factor Logistic analyses were performed to evaluate the training effectiveness and identify influencing factors.ResultsInfectious diseases emerged as one of the primary concerns among foreign aid medical team members, showing a significant negative correlation with the effectiveness of training in alleviating concerns (OR=0.11, P=0.003). Among the training intervention measures, being a medical professional (OR=6.59, P=0.005), distribution of courseware or prevention and control manuals after training (OR=4.93, P=0.011), and effective public education on infectious disease prevention and control in the sending province (OR=22.73, P=0.001) significantly enhanced the training’s effectiveness in alleviating concerns. In terms of improving infectious disease prevention and control capabilities, the formulation of infectious disease prevention and control plans by the medical team (OR=15.81, P<0.001) and effective public education efforts in the sending province (OR=71.94, P<0.001) demonstrated a strong promoting effect. However, the behavior of team members actively seeking infectious disease knowledge after training was negatively correlated with capability enhancement (OR=0.04, P=0.039).Conclusion The future infectious disease prevention and control training system for foreign aid medical teams should undergo a comprehensive optimization in terms of training content, training methods, emergency response plans, and public education efforts. By refining the training content, enhancing the diversity and practicality of training methods, formulating infectious disease prevention and control plans, and constructing a "sending province-recipient country" dual-track collaborative public education system, the infectious disease prevention and control capabilities of foreign aid medical team members can be comprehensively elevated. This will ensure their effective response to various infectious disease risks during foreign aid missions and enable them to make greater contributions to the healthcare sector of recipient countries.

参考文献/References:

［1］周银燕, 刘睿宁, 吕伟. “一带一路”背景下我国援外医疗工作的现状评价与优化策略［J］. 云南行政学院学报, 2019, 21(5): 167-172.［2］梁晓诗, 李娜玲. “一带一路”倡议背景下我国援外医疗工作现状及对策研究——以广东省援外医疗工作为例［J］. 卫生软科学, 2021, 35(7): 31-34.［3］刘民权, 王曲. 国际互救型医疗卫生体系及中国未来的卫生援外方向［J］. 社会科学辑刊, 2020(3): 175-183.［4］郭佳. 后埃博拉时期中非卫生合作的趋向、挑战与建议［J］. 国际展望, 2017, 9(2): 114-131, 153-154.［5］陈嘉泳, 郝元涛, 周紫霄, 等. 困局与突围:广东援外医疗队派遣中面临的问题与对策［J］. 卫生软科学, 2016, 30(7): 18-22.［6］张剑荣, 唐艺瑜, 楚天舒, 等. 创新援外医疗管理模式探析［J］. 现代医院, 2022, 22(5): 660-662.［7］宋林子, 吴宇彤, 张鸿祺, 等. 短期专家型援外医疗模式实践与探讨［J］. 中国医院, 2016, 20(6): 79-80.［8］田娟, 何岚, 贾敏, 等. 新冠肺炎疫情下中国援非医疗队员心理健康状况及其影响因素分析［J］. 西安交通大学学报（医学版）, 2022, 43(4): 483-488.［9］汪小杰, 霍翔, 茆京来, 等. 中国援外医疗队队员传染病感染情况调查［J］. 中华疾病控制杂志, 2020, 24(8): 892-895.［10］宋芳, 石力文, 毛宗福, 等. 跨文化适应研究对卫生援外工作的启示［J］. 公共卫生与预防医学, 2019, 30(3): 7-9.［11］李占结, 张翔, 臧凤, 等. “四步法”医院感染防控全员培训考核模式及应用效果［J］. 中华医院感染学杂志, 2020, 30(22): 3498-3502.［12］阚庭, 陈楚琳, 刘晶晶, 等. 医护人员传染病突发事件培训项目的构建［J］. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2022, 21(2): 244-248.［13］ALHUMAID S, AL MUTAIR A, AL ALAWI Z, et al. Knowledge of infection prevention and control among healthcare workers and factors influencing compliance: a systematic review［J］. Antimicrob Resist & Infect Control, 2021, 10(1): 86.［14］富晓星, 程峰, MGINA EJ, 等. 东非两国公共卫生体系的新探索与启示［J］. 中国卫生政策研究, 2021, 14(8): 60-66.［15］王超, 卢祖洵. 疾病的社会属性与社会防控［J］. 中国公共卫生, 2022, 38(8): 1093-1096.［16］杜昌勇, 方硕文, 佘林夏子, 等. 安徽省赴南苏丹医疗队员援外工作需求调查与分析［J］. 中国农村卫生事业管理, 2021, 41(12): 883-888.［17］王佳欣, 吴浩, 赵京伟, 等. 重大传染病疫情应急能力评价指标研究现状［J］. 中华全科医学, 2023, 21(11): 1928-1931.［18］姜涛, 高波. 非洲疾病预防控制中心建设与体系发展战略［J］. 军事医学, 2016, 40(12): 999-1002.［19］庄丽玲, 江晓萍, 刘燕婷, 等. 基层护士对重大传染病核心应急能力的现状调查与提升对策［J］. 中西医结合护理（中英文）, 2024, 10(3): 127-129.

更新日期/Last Update: 2025-12-15