[1]王刚 黄彩凤 王祎祎 韩琳 易建华.员工对患者安全文化认知的现状调研[J].中国卫生质量管理,2020,27(02):064-67.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2020.27.2.20]
点击复制

员工对患者安全文化认知的现状调研
分享到：

《中国卫生质量管理》[ISSN:1006-7515/CN:CN 61-1283/R]

卷:
第27卷
期数:
2020年02期
页码:
064-67
栏目:
患者安全
出版日期:
2020-03-28

文章信息/Info

作者:
王刚 黄彩凤 王祎祎 韩琳 易建华
西安交通大学医学部公共卫生学院
关键词:
患者安全文化; 员工; 认知现状
Keywords:
Patient Safety Culture;  Staff;  Cognitive Status
DOI:
10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2020.27.2.20
摘要:
目的 了解某医院患者安全文化现状，为持续改善医疗质量提供依据。方法 对全院员工发放中文版医院患者安全文化调查表（HSOPSC），计算量表各维度及各条目的积极反应率。结果 共1 208名员工参与调查，组织的学习与持续改进、科室内团队合作、对医院安全的总体评价、管理者在促进患者安全方面的意愿和行动、管理者对患者安全的支持、交接班和转科等维度积极反应率均大于75%，为优势区域；人员配置、对错误的非惩罚性反应、沟通开放程度、不良事件报告频率等维度积极反应率均小于50%，为待改进区域。不同职称、学历、下班延误时间、年龄、岗位、与患者直接接触等因素对医院患者安全文化总分有显著影响。结论 该院员工对患者安全文化认知现状较好，但在人员配置等方面需继续改进。
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the current situation of patient safety culture in a hospital, and to provide evidence for continuous improvement of medical quality.MethodsThe Chinese version of "hospital survey on patient safety culture (HSOPSC)" was distributed to the staff of the hospital, and the positive response rate of each dimension and item of the scale was calculated. ResultsA total of 1 208 participants were included in the study. The positive response rate of organizational learning and continuous improvement, within department teamwork,overall evaluation of hospital safety, willingness and action of managers to promote patient safety, support of managers for patient safety, and shift and department transfer were all greater than 75%, which were the advantage areas. The positive response rate of personnel allocation, non-punitive response to errors, communication openness, and frequency of adverse event reporting were all less than 50%, which were the areas to be improved.The different professional titles, educational background, off duty delay time, age, post, and contact directly with patients had significant influence on the total score of hospital safety culture. Conclusion The staff of the hospital had a good cognition of the patient safety culture, but it needed to be improved in staffing and other aspects.

参考文献/References:

［1］Malherbe W, Cleland J. Assessment of Patient Safety Culture in an Adult Oncology Department in Saudi Arabia ［J］. Oman MedJ，2018,33(3):200-208.

相似文献/References:

[1]卫蕾,易利华.JCI标准下医院后勤员工的安全管理实践[J].中国卫生质量管理,2016,23(04):015.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2016.23.3.06]
[2]胡丹 严晓玲 谭晶 陈洁 张蕾 沈淇.中美安全文化调查结果比较[J].中国卫生质量管理,2016,23(06):057.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2016.23.6.20]
[3]胡丹严晓玲.国内医疗机构运用HSOPSC开展患者安全文化研究的系统评价[J].中国卫生质量管理,2017,24(02):024.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2017.24.2.08]
[4]罗云婷 李欢 邓蓉.患者安全文化文献计量学分析[J].中国卫生质量管理,2018,25(06):052.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2018.25.6.18]
[5]孟津鑫杜惠丽梁泽峰路伟.基于CiteSpace的国际患者安全文化研究进展文献计量分析[J].中国卫生质量管理,2019,26(05):063.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2019.26.5.19]
[6]邵小莉翟凯田磊韩琳王欣李晓艳.陕西省6所三级医院患者安全文化现状及影响因素研究[J].中国卫生质量管理,2021,28(04):055.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2021.28.4.16 ]
　SHAO Xiaoli,ZHAI Kai,TIAN Lei.Status and Influencing Factors of Patient Safety Culture in Six Tertiary Hospitals in Shaanxi Province[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2021,28(02):055.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2021.28.4.16 ]
[7]胡丹谭晶葛颖杰李晓翠.患者安全文化调查问卷HS-OPSC 2.0版的评价与思考[J].中国卫生质量管理,2021,28(10):055.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2021.28.10.15 ]
　HU Dan,TAN Jing,GE Yingjie.Evaluation and Consideration of the HSOPSC 2.0 Version of Patient Safety Culture Questionnaire[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2021,28(02):055.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2021.28.10.15 ]
[8]刘桂株 汤佳洁 张爱琴 刘玉秀 朱冬梅 秦峰 王芳.患者安全文化测评量表研制及信效度检验[J].中国卫生质量管理,2024,31(04):068.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2024.31.4.14]
　LIU Guizhu,TANG Jiajie,ZHANG Aiqin,et al.Development and Reliability and Validity of Patient Safety Culture Assessment Scale in Tertiary General Hospitals[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2024,31(02):068.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2024.31.4.14]
[9]周想玲 王芳 张驰 董嘉慧 杜力 谢鑫华 甄永祺.培训类型对医院患者安全文化水平影响的范围综述[J].中国卫生质量管理,2024,31(09):010.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2024.31.9.03]
　ZHOU Xiangling,WANG Fang,ZHANG Chi.Impact of the Training Type on Patient Safety Culture in Hospital: a Scope Review[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2024,31(02):010.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2024.31.9.03]

更新日期/Last Update: 2020-03-28