PDF下载

[1]赵业辰赵雪刘宝松魏楠张艳丽李海燕井淇郑文贵.基于PMC指数模型的我国省级三级医院评审政策量化评价[J].中国卫生质量管理,2026,33(8):12-16.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2026.33.8.03]
　ZHAO Yechen,ZHAO Xue,LIU Baosong.Quantitative Evaluation of Provincial Tertiary Hospital Accreditation Policies in China Based on the PMC Index Model[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2026,33(8):12-16.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2026.33.8.03]

点击复制

基于PMC指数模型的我国省级三级医院评审政策量化评价

《中国卫生质量管理》[ISSN:1006-7515/CN:CN 61-1283/R] 卷: 33 期数: 2026年8期页码: 12-16 栏目: 特别关注出版日期: 2026-08-15

Title:: Quantitative Evaluation of Provincial Tertiary Hospital Accreditation Policies in China Based on the PMC Index Model

作者:: 赵业辰赵雪刘宝松魏楠张艳丽李海燕井淇郑文贵; 山东第二医科大学公共卫生学院

Author(s):: ZHAO Yechen; ZHAO Xue; LIU Baosong; School of Public Health, Shandong Second Medical University

关键词:: 三级医院评审; 评审政策; 省级政策; PMC指数

Keywords:: Tertiary Hospital Accreditation; Accreditation Policy; Provincial Policies; PMC Index

分类号:: R197

DOI:: 10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2026.33.8.03

文献标志码:: A

摘要:: 目的量化评价我国省级三级医院评审政策，为三级医院评审政策制订和落实提供参考。方法检索我国31个省（自治区、直辖市）和新疆生产建设兵团卫生健康委官方网站，收集时间间隔在4年以内（2022年7月—2026年3月）的省级三级医院评审政策文本，运用 ROST CM 6软件提取高频词汇,并构建政策建模一致性（PMC）指数模型，对纳入政策文本进行量化评价。结果共纳入13个省份三级医院评审政策。纳入三级医院评审政策PMC指数介于5.85~7.10之间，平均PMC指数为6.36；从一级指标来看，政策性质、政策目标、政策内容、政策评价均分都高于0.90，其次是政策载体，均分为0.86。激励方式、政策实施和政策受体得分较低。结论省级三级医院评审政策内容存在结构性差异，但总体上有较好的科学性和规范性。建议丰富激励方式，增加正向激励；加强技术支持和实施保障；提高医院评审流程中第三方机构和普通群众的参与度。

Abstract:: ObjectiveTo quantitatively evaluate provincial-level tertiary hospital accreditation policies in China, so as to provide references for the formulation and implementation of tertiary hospital accreditation policies. MethodsThe official websites of health commissions of 31 provinces (autonomous regions and municipalities directly under the central government) and the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps in China were retrieved to collect provincial tertiary hospital accreditation policy texts within a 4-year interval (from July 2022 to March 2026). ROST CM 6 software was used to extract high-frequency words, and a PMC index model was constructed to conduct quantitative evaluation on the included policy texts.ResultsTertiary hospital accreditation policies from 13 provinces were finally included. The PMC index of the included policies ranged from 5.85 to 7.10, with an average PMC index of 6.36. From the perspective of first-level indicators, the average scores of policy nature, policy objective, policy content and policy evaluation were all higher than 0.90, followed by policy carrier with an average score of 0.86. The scores of incentive mode, policy implementation and policy recipient were relatively low.Conclusion There are structural differences in the content of provincial tertiary hospital accreditation policies, but they generally show good scientificity and standardization. It is recommended to enrich incentive methods to increase positive incentives, strengthen technical support and implementation guarantees, and improve the participation of third-party institutions and the general public in the hospital accreditation process.

参考文献/References:

［1］尹畅,张勤,陆勇,等.持续改进:医院评审的高质量发展之路［J］.中国卫生质量管理, 2023, 30(4):26-29.［2］许燕华,李季新,张维,等.高质量发展视角下三级公立医院评审对策研究［J］.中国卫生事业管理,2024,41(12):1360-1363.［3］赵娜,王吉善,王圣友,等.1985年-2017年医院评审评价相关中文文献计量分析［J］.中国卫生质量管理,2019,26(6):56-60.［4］刘海硕,林雨绿,徐琨,等.基于政策工具的我国公立医院高质量发展政策量化分析［J］.中国医院,2026,30(1):26-30.［5］束嘉俊,钱欣月,王璇,等.基于PMC指数模型的示范点城市DRG付费政策文本量化评价［J］.中国卫生质量管理, 2025, 32(10):30-36.［6］陈一涵,励晓红,吕军,等.残疾人健康管理相关政策变迁分析——基于Rost CM软件的政策文本分析［J］. 中国卫生事业管理, 2022, 39(5): 321-324, 339.［7］RUIZ EM, YAP SF, NAGARAJ S. Beyond the ceteris pari bus assumption: Modeling demand and supply assuming omnia mobilis ［J］. Int J Economics Res, 2008(2): 185-194. ［8］ESTRADA M. Policy modeling: definition classification and evaluation ［J］. J Policy Model, 2011, 33(4): 523-536.［9］张治国,向晨.基于PMC指数模型的我国医疗保障基金使用监管政策文本量化评价［J］.社会保障研究,2023(4):57-70.［10］汤修齐,邱服冰,邱卓英,等. 国际康复政策架构与核心内容研究:基于世界卫生组织康复政策文件的内容分析［J］. 中国康复理论与实践, 2021, 27(9): 996-1005. ［11］LILFORD R, CHEN YF, SUTTON M, et al. Hospital league tables, targets, and performance incentives should be used with care［J］. BMJ, 2025, 389: e083517.［12］傅欣.医院如何有效实施分层激励［J］.人力资源,2021(18):46-47.［13］AKDEMIR N, PETERSON NL, CAMPBELL MC, et al.Evaluation of continuous quality improvement in accreditation for medical education［J］.BMC Medical Education,2020,20(Suppl 1):308.［14］马尚寅,王占国,刘嘉吉,等.基于“考核指标+监测指标”的医院评审标准研究［J］.中国卫生质量管理,2024,31(2):39-42,51.［15］何含兵,赵世光,柴金龙,等.我国医院评审制度的变迁特征及问题研究［J］.中国医院管理,2021,41(7):60-62.［16］韦小泉.强化第三方机构管理推动预算绩效评价提质增效［J］.中国财政,2024(12):70-72.［17］秦钰梅,周尚成,余红星.国内外医院评审相关研究的重点问题综述［J］.华西医学,2024,39(6):989-992.［18］MALMMOSE M,LIBORIUSSEN MJ.Balancing autonomy and accountability in national public hospitals-a qualitative case study［J］.Accounting Forum,2025,49(3):606-633.［19］陈晔,马旭东,马丽平,等.我国第二轮医院评审方法应用现状的调查与分析［J］.中国医院管理,2020,40(9):9-12.

更新日期/Last Update: 2026-08-15