PDF下载

[1]冯伟明李欢诚杨省罗丽黄丽琴王争争周建词.神经专业质控指标平台在脑梗死医疗质量管理中的应用研究[J].中国卫生质量管理,2026,33(7):42-45.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2026.33.7.08]
　FENG Weiming,LI Huancheng,YANG Xing.Applied Research on the Neurology-Specific Quality Control Indicator Platform in the Medical Quality Management of Cerebral Infarction[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2026,33(7):42-45.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2026.33.7.08]

点击复制

神经专业质控指标平台在脑梗死医疗质量管理中的应用研究

《中国卫生质量管理》[ISSN:1006-7515/CN:CN 61-1283/R] 卷: 33 期数: 2026年7期页码: 42-45 栏目: 医疗质量出版日期: 2026-07-15

Title:: Applied Research on the Neurology-Specific Quality Control Indicator Platform in the Medical Quality Management of Cerebral Infarction

作者:: 冯伟明李欢诚杨省罗丽黄丽琴王争争周建词; 玉林市第二人民医院

Author(s):: FENG Weiming; LI Huancheng; YANG Xing; Yulin Second People’s Hospital

关键词:: 医院评审; 脑梗死; 医疗质量; 质控指标; 数据溯源; 自动采集

Keywords:: Hospital Accreditation; Cerebral Infarction; Medical Quality; Quality Control Indicators; Data Traceability; Automatic Collection

分类号:: R197.323；R743.3

DOI:: 10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2026.33.7.08

文献标志码:: B

摘要:: 目的基于《广西壮族自治区三级综合医院评审标准实施细则（2023年版）》对数据的要求，探讨“数据自动采集”与“一键溯源”神经专业质控指标平台在脑梗死医疗质量管理中的应用效果。方法选取2021—2022年收治的7 864例脑梗死患者作为对照组（常规人工质控），2023—2024年收治的7 460例患者作为干预组（应用神经专业质控指标平台），对比两组患者脑梗死质控指标、数据准确率及溯源效率。结果干预组在病情评估、诊疗及时性、救治能力及规范化诊疗共12项质控指标均显著优于对照组（P＜0.001）。神经专业质控指标平台将数据准确率从70.0%提升至100%，溯源耗时从（10.0±2.2）分钟/例缩短至（0.10±0.05）分钟/例。结论神经专业质控指标平台不仅能够满足三甲评审对数据质量与溯源的核心要求，而且能够系统性提升脑梗死医疗质量，并有效解决基层医院在数据采集与追溯方面的实际困难。

Abstract:: ObjectiveBased on the data requirements specified in the "Implementation Rules for the Accreditation Standards of Tertiary General Hospitals in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region (2023 Edition)", this study explores the application effects of a neurology-specific quality control indicator platform featuring "automatic data collection" and "one-click traceability" in the medical quality management of cerebral infarction. MethodsA total of 7 864 patients with cerebral infarction admitted from 2021 to 2022 were selected as the control group (conventional manual quality control), and 7 460 patients admitted from 2023 to 2024 were selected as the intervention group (neurology-specific quality control indicator platform). The quality control indicators, data accuracy, and traceability efficiency of cerebral infarction were compared between the two groups.ResultsThe intervention group demonstrated significantly superior performance across all 12 quality control indicators, including condition assessment, treatment timeliness, rescue capability, and standardized diagnosis and treatment, compared with the control group (P<0.001). The neurology-specific quality control indicator platform improved data accuracy from 70.0% to 100% and reduced traceability time from (10.0 ±2.2) min/case to (0.10 ± 0.05) min/case.Conclusion The neurology-specific quality control indicator platform not only meets the core requirements of Grade-A tertiary hospital accreditation regarding data quality and traceability, but also systematically improves the medical quality of cerebral infarction care and effectively addresses the practical difficulties faced by primary hospitals in data collection and traceability.

参考文献/References:

［1］杨璐，陈萍.基于认知障碍与神经功能受损分析数字作业疗法认知训练联合运动康复训练在脑梗死患者中的作用［J］.中国实用神经疾病杂志，2025，28（6）：741-745.［2］KHAN SS，CORESH J，PENCINA MJ，et al.Novel prediction equations for absolute risk assessment of total cardiovascular disease incorporating cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic health：a scientific statement from the American Heart Association［J］.Circulation，2023，148（24）：1982-2004. ［3］国家心血管病中心，中国心血管健康与疾病报告编写组，胡盛寿.中国心血管健康与疾病报告2024概要［J］.中国循环杂志，2025，40（6）：521-559.［4］刘明波，何新叶，杨晓红，等.《中国心血管健康与疾病报告2024》要点解读［J］.中国全科医学，2025，28（32）：3989-4008.［5］黄先涛，靖超，王晨宇.基于《医疗质量管理办法》的医疗质量控制体系建设实践［J］.中国卫生质量管理，2021，28（2）：20-22，34.［6］马谢民.三级公立医院绩效考核指标中医疗质量指标及相关问题探讨［J］.中国医院管理，2022，42（4）：49-52.［7］FONAROW GC，REEVES MJ，SMITH EE，et al.Characteristics，performance measures，and in-hospital outcomes of the first one million stroke and transient ischemic attack admissions in get with the guidelines-stroke［J］.Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes，2010，3（3）：291-302.［8］张珠凤，李白玉，李柯叶，等.基于定位二维码技术构建急性缺血性脑卒中流程管理模式［J］.中国卫生质量管理，2024，31（5）：5-8，12.［9］张文一，李帅，毛丽，等.急性脑梗死再灌注治疗管理模式研究［J］.中国卫生质量管理，2022，29（5）：29-33.［10］杨昕，谷鸿秋，王海波，等.全国三级公立医院卒中医疗质量现状分析［J］.中国卫生质量管理，2020，27（1）：5-8.［11］刘燃峰，赵巍.基于医院信息平台的等级医院评审系统设计［J］.中国数字医学，2023，18（11）：47-51.［12］中华医学会神经病学分会，中华医学会神经病学分会脑血管病学组.中国缺血性卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作二级预防指南2022［J］.中华神经科杂志，2022，55（10）：1071-1110.［13］中华医学会神经病学分会，中华医学会神经病学分会脑血管病学组.中国急性缺血性卒中诊治指南2023［J］.中华神经科杂志，2024，57（6）：523-559.［14］LEVINE DA，GROSS AL，BRICEO EM，et al.Sex differences in cognitive decline among US adults［J］.JAMA Netw Open，2021，4（2）：e210169.

相似文献/References:

[1]王明君,孙晓维,陈志强,等.第二周期三级甲等综合医院复核评审实践[J].中国卫生质量管理,2016,23(03):31.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2016.23.3.10]
[2]周华赵娜张艳丽王圣友陈晓红王吉善.医院评价综合管理常见问题分析[J].中国卫生质量管理,2017,24(02):11.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2017.24.2.04]
[3]张振建胡必富许景东张振东梅芬魏峰.从等级医院评审看医疗质量规范化管理[J].中国卫生质量管理,2018,25(02):29.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2018.25.2.09]
[4]王巍马丽平陈晔.我国医院持续改进研究的可视化分析[J].中国卫生质量管理,2021,28(04):25.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2021.28.4.08 ]
　WANG Wei,MA Liping,CHEN Ye.Visualization Analysis of Hospital Continuous Improvement Research in China[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2021,28(7):25.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2021.28.4.08 ]
[5]张艳丽王吉善邵明邦孙佳璐赵娜孙辉王莹陈晓红.《三级医院评审标准》新旧版本比较分析及建议[J].中国卫生质量管理,2021,28(05):19.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2021.28.5.06 ]
　ZHANG Yanli,WANG Jishan,SHAO Mingbang.Comparison and Suggestions of Accreditation Standards for Tertiary General Hospitals 2020 Edition and 2011 Edition[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2021,28(7):19.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2021.28.5.06 ]
[6]孙佳璐杨昕李子孝王拥军马旭东.我国脑梗死质量管理的历史演变[J].中国卫生质量管理,2021,28(08):15.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2021.28.8.05 ]
　SUN Jialu,YANG Xin,LI Zixiao.Historical Evolution of Quality Management of Cerebral Infarction in China[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2021,28(7):15.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2021.28.8.05 ]
[7]赵娜陈晓红孙辉孙佳璐王莹张艳丽.三级综合医院院感评价数据关联规则分析及启示[J].中国卫生质量管理,2022,29(02):26.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.2.07 ]
　ZHAO Na,CHEN Xiaohong,SUN Hui.Association Rule Analysis of Nosocomial Infection Evaluation Data in Tertiary General Hospitals and Management Inspiration[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2022,29(7):26.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.2.07 ]
[8]尹畅张勤陆勇王惠英刘倩楠郭璇许明璐马旭东.持续改进：医院评审的高质量发展之路[J].中国卫生质量管理,2023,30(04):26.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2023.30.4.08 ]
　YIN Chang,ZHANG Qin,LU Yong.Continuous Improvement: a High Quality Development Path for Hospital Review[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2023,30(7):26.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2023.30.4.08 ]
[9]马尚寅王占国*刘嘉吉边雨桐徐跃峰刘鹏飞.基于“考核指标+监测指标”的医院评审标准研究[J].中国卫生质量管理,2024,31(02):39.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2024.31.2.10]
　MA Shangyin,WANG Zhanguo,LIU Jiaji.Research on Hospital Evaluation Standards Based on the "Assessment Index Plus Monitoring Index"[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2024,31(7):39.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2024.31.2.10]
[10]靳巍巍黄晓冉喻雅兰张婷李晓莉马西文.医疗集团全面质量管理体系信息化建设与应用[J].中国卫生质量管理,2025,32(04):56.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2025.32.4.13]
　JIN Weiwei,HUANG Xiaoran,YU Yalan.Construction and Application of the Information System for Total Quality Management System in Medical Group[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2025,32(7):56.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2025.32.4.13]

更新日期/Last Update: 2026-07-15