[1]毛一晴.基于TEAM准则的我国肿瘤多学科诊疗模式有效性评估工具开发与应用[J].中国卫生质量管理,2025,32(04):046-52.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2025.32.4.11]
 MAO Yiqing.Development and Application of an Evaluation Tool for the Effectiveness of Multidisciplinary Diagnosis and Treatment Mode for Cancer in China Based on the TEAM Criteria[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2025,32(04):046-52.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2025.32.4.11]
点击复制

基于TEAM准则的我国肿瘤多学科诊疗模式有效性评估工具开发与应用()
分享到:

《中国卫生质量管理》[ISSN:1006-7515/CN:CN 61-1283/R]

卷:
第32卷
期数:
2025年04期
页码:
046-52
栏目:
医疗质量
出版日期:
2025-04-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Development and Application of an Evaluation Tool for the Effectiveness of Multidisciplinary Diagnosis and Treatment Mode for Cancer in China Based on the TEAM Criteria
作者:
毛一晴
郑州大学附属肿瘤医院/河南省肿瘤医院
Author(s):
MAO Yiqing
The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University&Henan Cancer Hospital
关键词:
肿瘤多学科诊疗有效性评估TEAM准则
Keywords:
CancerMultidisciplinary Diagnosis and TreatmentEffectiveness EvaluationTEAM Criteria
分类号:
R197.323;R73
DOI:
10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2025.32.4.11
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的基于英国国家癌症行动小组提出的TEAM准则,开发适用于我国的肿瘤多学科诊疗(MDT)模式有效性评估工具并进行应用,为肿瘤MDT模式可持续发展提供参考。方法采用文献分析法,经研究小组讨论初步构建评估条目,通过两轮专家咨询确定评估内容,并进行信效度检验。对33个肿瘤MDT团队的491名成员开展问卷调查,了解MDT模式有效性现状。结果评估工具包括一级维度5个、二级维度17个、三级评价条目36个。评估工具效标效度r值均>0.80(P<0.05),结构效度KMO值为0.849(P<0.001),内部一致性Cronbach’s α系数为0.920。65.6%的MDT成员认为肿瘤MDT模式有效性处于中等水平,一级维度中团队组成(59.5%)、会议组织(73.3%)、以患者为中心的临床决策(63.1%)和二级维度中会议后期(56.2%)、以患者为中心的照护(58.1%)等有效性处于中低水平。结论构建的肿瘤MDT模式有效性评估工具具有创新性和可行性。应进一步完善制度和标准,加强成本效益分析,关注群体决策行为,规范质控体系,深化“以患者为中心”的服务内涵。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo develop and apply an evaluation tool tailored to China’s context for assessing the effectiveness of multidisciplinary diagnosis and treatment (MDT) model for cancer based on the TEAM criteria proposed by the UK’s National Cancer Action Team, providing reference for the sustainable development of the MDT model for cancer.MethodsA literature review was conducted, and initial evaluation items were constructed through discussions among a research panel. The content of the evaluation was finalized through two rounds of expert consultations, followed by reliability and validity testing. A questionnaire survey was administered to 491 members from 33 MDT teams for cancer to understand the current status of MDT model effectiveness.ResultsThe evaluation tool comprises 5 primary dimensions, 17 secondary dimensions, and 36 tertiary items. The criterion-related validity r-values of the evaluation tool were all >0.80(P<0.05), the structural validity KMO value was 0.849 (P<0.001), and the internal consistency Cronbach’s α coefficient was 0.920. According to 65.6% of MDT members, the effectiveness of the MDT model for cancer was at a moderate level. Within the primary dimensions, team composition (59.5%), meeting organization (73.3%), and patient-centered clinical decision-making (63.1%) were rated as moderately to low effective, while within the secondary dimensions, post-meeting follow-up (56.2%) and patient-centered care (58.1%) were rated as moderately to low effective.Conclusion The developed evaluation tool for assessing the effectiveness of MDT model for cancer is innovative and feasible. It is necessary to further improve systems and standards, strengthen cost-benefit analysis, focus on group decision-making behaviors, standardize quality control systems, and deepen the connotation of "patient-centered" services.

参考文献/References:

[1]WINTERS DA,SOUKUP T,SEVDALIS N,et al.The cancer multidisciplinary team meeting: in need of change?History,challenges and future perspectives[J].BJU International,2021,128(3):271-279.[2]毛一晴.基于政策工具的我国多学科诊疗模式政策内容研究[J].中国卫生事业管理, 2024, 41(1):50-53.[3]李欣, 赵阳, 王贤吉, 等.肿瘤多学科协作诊疗有效性评价工具研究系统综述[J].中国医院管理, 2024, 44(3):39-44.[4]乔佳敏,张赫楠.赋权增能视域下门诊多学科协作诊疗服务质量提升策略研究[J].中国卫生质量管理,2024,31(8):30-33,37.[5]TRAN TH,D BOER J,GYORKI DE,et al.Optimising the quality of multidisciplinary team meetings: a narrative review[J].Cancer Medicine, 2022,11(9):1965-1971.[6]National Cancer Action Team.The characteristics of an effective multidisciplinary team[Z].2010.[7]LAMB BW,WONG HWL,VINCENT C,et al.Teamwork and team performance in multidisciplinary cancer teams: development and evaluation of an observational assessment tool[J].BMJ Quality & Safety,2011,20(10):849-856.[8]杨曌旻,熊华军.有效性教学真的有效吗?基于比斯塔教育思想的审视[J].开放教育研究, 2023,29(6):52-59.[9]喻文菡.肿瘤MDT团队建设与运行过程评价及改进策略研究[D].武汉:华中科技大学, 2018.[10]李欣,余松轩,陈佳,等.肿瘤多学科协作诊疗有效实践认知调查问卷的研制和信效度检验[J].中国卫生资源,2023,26(6):736-743.[11]TAYLOR C,BROWN K,LAMB B, et al.Developing and testing TEAM (Team Evaluation and Assessment Measure), a self-assessment tool to improve cancer multidisciplinary teamwork[J]. Ann Surg Oncol,2012,19(13):4019-4027.[12]LAMB BW,MIAH S,SKOLARUS TA, et al.Development and validation of a short version of the metric for the observation of decision-making in multidisciplinary tumor boards: MODe-Lite[J].Ann Surg Oncol,2021,28(2):7577-7588.[13]TAYLOR C,ATKINS L,RICHARDSON A,et al.Measuring the quality of MDT working: an observational approach[J].BMC Cancer,2012,12:202.[14]BROWN GTF,BEKKER HL,YOUNG AL.Quality and efficacy of Multidisciplinary Team (MDT) quality assessment tools and discussion checklists: a systematic review[J].BMC Cancer,2022, 22(1):286.[15]LUU TT.Cancer patient management: role of multidisciplinary teams[J].BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care,2022,12(2):201-206.[16]毛一晴,康定鼎,张博文,等.国内外多学科团队诊疗模式研究进展[J].中国医院,2022, 26(3):18-21.[17]王 莹,刘新亚,刘 翔,等.应用TOPSIS法综合评价肿瘤多学科首席专家团队的医疗工作质量[J].中国肿瘤,2018,27(12):898-903.[18]李贤华,宋 婷,赵子衿,等.上海市医院多学科协作诊疗绩效评价体系构建[J].中国医院管理,2019,39(11):29-31,35.[19]杨凌鹤,温中一,刘美岑,等.我国40家三级公立医院多学科诊疗模式经验总结[J].中华医院管理杂志,2021,37(6):505-508.[20]尚 明,宋吉祥,于海宁.基于史密斯模型的我国三级肿瘤医院多学科诊疗模式执行问题研究[J].中国医院管理,2023,43(10):55-58.[21]王仓红,胡才双,朱 靓.基于医生视角的多学科诊疗模式现状和改善策略[J].卫生经济研究,2022,39(2):64-66.[22]杨凌鹤,刘美岑,曹 曼,等.我国三级肿瘤医院多学科诊疗模式开展现状调查[J].中国卫生质量管理,2022,29(10):40-44.[23]张瑜洁,王 健,曹 硕,等.基于CiteSpace的多学科诊疗应用研究的热点与趋势分析[J]. 医学与社会,2023,36(7):62-67.[24]彭婷婷,姜 艳,蒋晓英,等.基于群体决策理论的多学科诊疗运行过程及其影响因素[J].医学与社会,2021,34(12):75-79.[25]毛一晴,康定鼎,张博文,等.嵌入性视角下多学科团队诊疗模式案例研究[J].中国医院,2022, 26(2):53-56.[26]WALRAVEN JEW,VAN DER HEL OL,VAN DER HOEVEN JJM,et al.Factors influencing the quality and functioning of oncological multidisciplinary team meetings:results of a systematic review[J].BMC Health Serv Res,2022,22(1):829.[27]陈 佳,李 欣,葛 锋,等.医务人员对肿瘤多学科协作诊疗有效实践的认知现状及影响因素[J].中国卫生资源,2023,26(6):744-750.

相似文献/References:

[1]孙湛 杨丽 邵雨婷 王敬茹.多学科诊疗模式现状分析与思考[J].中国卫生质量管理,2018,25(06):037.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2018.25.6.13]
[2]陈晓炜 邵玉婷 耿劲松 陈钱.肿瘤新兴技术水平扫描报告分析及启示[J].中国卫生质量管理,2018,25(06):099.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2018.25.6.29]
[3]敬小梅 李扬 张兆晖 郭鹏 程川东.肿瘤专科医院如何开展多学科诊疗[J].中国卫生质量管理,2020,27(02):007.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2020.27.2.03]
[4]杨亚梁晨陈桢傅小芳张继东骆华杰.国内外多学科诊疗模式研究进展分析[J].中国卫生质量管理,2021,28(02):016.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2021.28.2.06 ]
 YANG Ya,LIANG Chen,CHEN Zhen.Analysis of Research Progress of the Multidisciplinary Team Model at Home and Abroad[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2021,28(04):016.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2021.28.2.06 ]
[5]薛缪群计长琴刘景瑜王勤石青青陈园园蒋玥朱颖春山惠枝 贺方方陆菲菲孙小玲孔娜.基于医护患协作的辅助生育治疗中卵巢过度刺激综合征全流程诊疗模式构建[J].中国卫生质量管理,2021,28(06):085.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2021.28.6.23 ]
 XUE Miaoqun,JI Changqin,LIU Jingyu.Construction of a Whole-Process Diagnosis and Treatment Mode for Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome in Assisted Reproductive Therapy Based on Doctor-Nurse-Patient Collaboration[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2021,28(04):085.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2021.28.6.23 ]
[6]成月佳徐云华侯旭敏茅腾徐婷婷吴镜湘侯冷晨余松轩.矩阵式管理在胸部手术加速康复外科的实践效果研究[J].中国卫生质量管理,2021,28(12):001.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2021.28.12.01 ]
 CHENG Yuejia,XU Yunhua,HOU Xumin.Practice of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in Thoracic Surgery Based on Matrix Management Mode[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2021,28(04):001.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2021.28.12.01 ]
[7]杨凌鹤刘美岑曹曼温中一廖子锐刘远立.我国三级肿瘤医院多学科诊疗模式开展现状调查[J].中国卫生质量管理,2022,29(10):040.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.10.09 ]
 YANG Linghe,LIU Meicen,CAO Man.Multi-Disciplinary Team Model in China's Tertiary Tumor Hospitals: A Cross-Sectional Investigation[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2022,29(04):040.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.10.09 ]
[8]韩胜昔张晓丽田刘钧季皓朱燕刚.肺癌诊疗中心的管理实践与思考[J].中国卫生质量管理,2022,29(10):045.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.10.10 ]
 HAN Shengxi,ZHANG Xiaoli,TIAN Liujun.Management Practice and Thinking of Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Center[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2022,29(04):045.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.10.10 ]
[9]林伟龙邓明梁锌甘蓝霞杨娟王惠杨谨成杨文静.2017年-2019年我国三级公立医院肿瘤住院患者医疗服务与质量安全分析[J].中国卫生质量管理,2022,29(11):001.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.11.01 ]
 LIN Weilong,DENG Ming,LIANG Xin.Analysis on Medical Service and Quality Safety of Tumor Inpatients in Chinese Tertiary Public Hospitals from 2017 to 2019[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2022,29(04):001.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.11.01 ]
[10]邓明时黎明林伟龙杨谨成安宇杨娟周成诚杨文静.我国肿瘤单病种质控路径实践与展望[J].中国卫生质量管理,2022,29(11):006.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.11.02 ]
 DENG Ming,SHI Liming,LIN Weilong.Practice and Prospect of Quality Control Path of Single Disease of Tumor in China[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2022,29(04):006.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.11.02 ]
[11]周成诚 杨娟 杨谨成 时黎明 安宇 王惠 郑苏菲 杨文静.我国肺癌多学科诊疗建设现状调查研究[J].中国卫生质量管理,2024,31(11):035.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2024.31.11.08]
 ZHOU Chengcheng,YANG Juan,Yang Jincheng.Investigation on the Current Situation of Multi-Disciplinary Treatment of Lung Cancer in China[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2024,31(04):035.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2024.31.11.08]

更新日期/Last Update: 2025-04-15