[1]李燕秋 付秀云 张彩凤 盛熔 卢家盛 苏茜 邹丹 彭美晴.患儿经中心静脉导管采血的循证护理实践[J].中国卫生质量管理,2024,31(12):067-71.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2024.31.12.14]
 LI Yanqiu,FU Xiuyun,ZHANG Caifeng.Evidence-Based Nursing Practice of Blood Collection through Central Venous Catheter in Children[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2024,31(12):067-71.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2024.31.12.14]
点击复制

患儿经中心静脉导管采血的循证护理实践()
分享到:

《中国卫生质量管理》[ISSN:1006-7515/CN:CN 61-1283/R]

卷:
第31卷
期数:
2024年12期
页码:
067-71
栏目:
护理质量
出版日期:
2024-12-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Evidence-Based Nursing Practice of Blood Collection through Central Venous Catheter in Children
作者:
李燕秋 付秀云 张彩凤 盛熔 卢家盛 苏茜 邹丹 彭美晴
广州医科大学附属妇女儿童医疗中心
Author(s):
LI YanqiuFU XiuyunZHANG Caifeng
Women and Children ’s Medical Center Affiliated to Guangzhou Medical University
关键词:
中心静脉导管采血循证护理护理质量
Keywords:
Central Venous CatheterBlood CollectionEvidence-Based NursingNursing Quality
分类号:
R47
DOI:
10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2024.31.12.14
文献标志码:
B
摘要:
目的将经中心静脉导管(CVC)采血的最佳证据应用于临床实践并评价其效果。方法遵循循证护理方法,将经CVC采血的最佳证据制订成循证实践方案,经基线审查、障碍因素分析等构建最佳证据应用策略,共总结出11条最佳证据,制订了10条质量审查指标。于 2023 年 4月20 日-8月30日在广州市某三级甲等医院小儿普外科病房实施最佳证据转化。结果证据应用后,护士对审查指标3、4、7、10的执行率均达到 100.0% ,其余审查指标执行率均超过85%;护士经CVC采血知识问卷得分有显著提高,证据应用前后比较差异有统计学意义(Z=-3.225,P<0.001);患儿经皮采血时疼痛评分及经CVC采血时疼痛评分的中位数及四分位数分别为 8(6.5,9)分、0(0,0)分,两者比较差异有统计学意义(Z=-3.201,P<0.001)。结论将基于循证方法的经CVC采血的最佳证据应用于临床,可在一定程度上降低患儿血液标本采集时的疼痛感,提高护士对经CVC采血相关知识知晓率及执行率,规范护士经CVC采血护理行为,从而提高护理质量。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo apply the best evidence of blood collection through central venous catheter (CVC) to clinical practice and evaluate its effect.MethodsFollowing the evidence-based nursing method, the best evidence of blood collection through CVC was formulated into an evidence-based practice plan. The best evidence application strategy was constructed through baseline review and obstacle factor analysis. A total of 11 best evidences were summarized and 10 quality review indicators were formulated. From April 20 to August 30, 2023, the best evidence transformation was implemented in the pediatric general surgery ward of a tertiary hospital in Guangzhou. ResultsAfter the application of evidence, the implementation rates of review indicators 3, 4, 7 and 10 reached 100.0% by nurses, and the implementation rates of other review indicators exceeded 85%. The scores on the knowledge of blood collection through CVC among nurses were significantly improved, and the difference before and after the application of the evidence was statistically significant (Z=-3.225,P<0.001). The median and quartile of pain score at percutaneous blood collection and CVC blood collection were 8 (6.5,9) and 0 (0,0), respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (Z=-3.201,P<0.001). Conclusion Applying the best evidence based on evidence-based CVC blood collection to clinical practice can reduce the pain of children due to the collection of blood samples to a certain extent. It can also improve the awareness rate and implementation rate of the knowledge related to CVC blood collection among nurses, standardize the nursing behavior of nurses through CVC blood collection, so as to improve the quality of nursing.

参考文献/References:

[1]王 屹.护理证据应用对小儿静脉采血前后疼痛的影响分析[J].中国保健营养,2017,27(30):210-211.[2]ASHEGHAN M,KHATIBI A,HOLISAZ MT.Paresthesia and forearm pain after phlebotomy due to medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve injury[J].J Brachial Plex Peripher Nerve Inj,2011,6(1):5.[3]HJELMGREN H,NILSSON A,ANDERSSON-PAPADOGIANNAKIS N,et al.Retrospective study showed that blood sampling errors risked children’s well-being and safety in a Swedish paediatric tertiary care[J].Acta Paediatr,2019,108(3):522-528.[4]曹秋君,吴 燕.预防静脉血液标本溶血的最佳证据总结[J].中华护理杂志,2018,53(8):1000-1004.[5]张元元,黄 华,金 婷,等.ADDIE模型在病区血标本采集质量改进中的应用[J].护理学杂志,2022,37(14):72-75.[6]DAILEY MS,BERGER B,DABU F.Activated partial thromboplastin times from venipuncture versus central venous catheter specimens in adults receiving continuous heparin infusions[J].Crit Care Nurse,2014,34(5):27-42.[7]胡 雁,郝玉芳.循证护理学[M].2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2018:45.[8]KOLAEK S,PUNTIS J,HOJSAK I. ESPGHAN/ESPEN/ESPR guidelines on pediatric parenteral nutrition:venous access[J].Clin Nutr,2018,37(6 PB):2379-2391.[9]GORSKI LA,HADAWAY L,HAGLE ME,et al.Infusion therapy standards of practice,8th edition[J].J Infus Nurs,2021,44(Suppl1):S1-S224.[10]SPINA R,MUSSA B,TOLLAPI L,et al.Adoption and application in Italy of the principal guidelines and international recommendations on venous access[J].Minerva Med,2018,109(3):153-202.[11]LING ML,APISARNTHAN ARAK A,JAGGI N,et al.APSIC guide for prevention of Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infections (CLABSI)[J].Antimicrob Resist Infect Control,2016,5(1):16.[12]CHAVES F,GARNACHO-MONTERO J,DEL POZO JL,et al.Diagnosis and treatment of catheter-related bloodstream infection:clinical guidelines of the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology and (SEIMC) and the Spanish Society of Spanish Society of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine and Coronary Units(SEMICYUC)[J].Med Intensiva(Engl Ed),2018,42(1):5-36.[13]FERREIRA J,CAMARGOS PAM,CLEMENTE WT,et al.Clinical usefulness of catheter-drawn blood samples and catheter-tip cultures for the diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infections in neonates[J].Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology,2020,41(7):854-856.[14]张晓梅,秦 毅,陈 瑜,等.经中心静脉通路装置采血的最佳证据总结[J].中华护理杂志,2022,57(9):1134-1140.[15]王春青,胡 雁.JBI证据预分级及证据推荐级别系统(2014版)[J].护士进修杂志,2015,30(11):964-967.[16]熊 俊,陈日新.系统评价/Meta 分析方法学质量的评价工具AMSTAR[J].中国循证医学杂志,2011,11(9):1084-1089. [17]周英凤,顾 莺,胡 雁,等.JBI循证卫生保健中心关于不同类型研究的质量评价工具:证据应用性研究的质量评价[J].护士进修杂志,2018,33(1):24-26.[18]陈凌华,林文璇,颜斐斐,等.基于 KTA 知识转化模式的择期支气管镜检查患者术前管理循证实践[J].护理学杂志,2021,36(18):91-94.[19]李亚新,邵红艳,安艳涛,等.全身麻醉下纤维支气管镜检查患者围手术期饮食护理的循证实践[J].中华护理杂志,2023,58(19):2319-2325.[20]刘美凤.改良式生命体征观测单用于疼痛记录的效果观察[J].护理研究,2014,28(4):1388-1389.[21]江 艳,路群峰,黄一敏,等.基于应激适应理论的无哭声小儿日间手术室的创建[J].中国卫生质量管理,2021,28(3):12-14.

相似文献/References:

[1]庞兴旺 周艳君 黄芳.双向选择模式在采血一线工作中的应用[J].中国卫生质量管理,2018,25(03):100.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2018.25.3.31]
[2]严伟斌王明元张辉谢淑红.采血服务规范地方标准编制研究[J].中国卫生质量管理,2022,29(04):087.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.4.22 ]
 YAN Weibin,WANG Mingyuan,ZHANG Hui.Compilation of Local Standard Based on Blood Collection Service Specification[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2022,29(12):087.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.4.22 ]
[3]刘彩飞刘小敏龙卓辛霞高菊林王莉莹代雯晴陈思婕杨聪.血液净化用中心静脉导管相关血流感染防控管理的最佳证据总结[J].中国卫生质量管理,2024,31(03):045.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2024.31.3.12]
 LIU Caifei,LIU Xiaomin,LONG Zhuo.Summary of Best Evidence for the Prevention and Control Management of Bloodstream Infections Associated with Central Venous Catheters for Blood Purification[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2024,31(12):045.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2024.31.3.12]
[4]管萍 陈珺 孙月 沈玲娣 孙霁雯 罗雯懿.儿童专科医院护士中心静脉导管相关血流感染预防知信行调查[J].中国卫生质量管理,2024,31(06):050.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2024.31.6.11]
 GUAN Ping,CHEN Jun,SUN Yue.Investigation on Nurses’ Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Preventing Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection in Children’s Hospital[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2024,31(12):050.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2024.31.6.11]
[5]刘小敏 刘彩飞 龙卓 高菊林 辛霞 代雯晴.陕西省血液净化从业护士中心静脉导管相关血流感染预防知信行水平调查[J].中国卫生质量管理,2024,31(10):060.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2024.31.10.12]
 LIU Xiaomin,LIU Caifei,LONG Zhuo.Investigation on Knowledge, Attitude and Practice Level of Central Venous Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infection Prevention among Blood Purification Nurses in Shaanxi Province[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2024,31(12):060.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2024.31.10.12]

更新日期/Last Update: 2024-12-15