[1]付婷辉冷京倍陈吟仇叶龙董爱然侯东敏郭默宁.新生儿出生体重与入院体重对DRG分组影响分析[J].中国卫生质量管理,2023,30(05):055-60.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2023.30.5.12 ]
　FU Tinghui,LENG Jingbei,CHEN Yin.Effect of Neonatal Birth Weight and Admission Weight on DRG Grouping[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2023,30(05):055-60.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2023.30.5.12 ]
点击复制

新生儿出生体重与入院体重对DRG分组影响分析
分享到：

《中国卫生质量管理》[ISSN:1006-7515/CN:CN 61-1283/R]

卷:
第30卷
期数:
2023年05期
页码:
055-60
栏目:
聚焦DRG
出版日期:
2023-05-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effect of Neonatal Birth Weight and Admission Weight on DRG Grouping
作者:
付婷辉冷京倍陈吟仇叶龙董爱然侯东敏郭默宁
首都医科大学附属北京妇产医院（北京妇幼保健院）
Author(s):
FU Tinghui; LENG Jingbei; CHEN Yin
Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University(Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital)
关键词:
新生儿; 出生体重; 入院体重; DRG分组
Keywords:
Newborn;  Birth Weight;  Admission Weight;  DRG Grouping
分类号:
R197.323
DOI:
10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2023.30.5.12
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的为提升新生儿DRG分组的准确性，分别应用出生体重与入院体重作为入组条件，寻找入组依据。方法数据来源于某市2016年1月1日-2020年12月31日出生天数＜29 d的新生儿病案首页数据，应用CN-DRG分组方案（2018版）进行DRG分组，采用SPSS 24.0软件进行统计分析。结果新生儿出生体重与入院体重均完整者占新生儿首页数据的77.1%；对于新生儿体重密切相关DRG组别，将出生体重与入院体重分别作为入组条件，入组一致及差异分别占97.6%及2.4%；对于入组存在差异的1 821例，按照出生体重与入院体重入组准确分别占83.1%及8.5%，新生儿平均出生天数分别为6.00 d、18.85 d；对于新生儿平均出生天数≤7 d按出生体重入组准确，平均出生天数＞14 d按出生天数构成及伴随问题选择入组体重；新生儿出生天数为8 d～14 d，出生体重与入院体重入组无差异。线性回归分析显示，出生体重回归系数绝对值＞入院体重回归系数绝对值。结论新生儿出生体重对DRG分组影响大于入院体重。应关注早产儿出生体重与入院体重变化，提升病案首页新生儿出生体重与入院体重的完整性，将合理体重作为DRG分组依据。
Abstract:
ObjectiveIn order to improve the accuracy of newborn DRG grouping, birth weight and admission weight were used as enrollment conditions respectively to find the basis for enrollment rules.MethodsThe data were collected from the first page of neonatal medical records whose birth days were less than 29 days from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2020 in a city. The CN-DRG grouping scheme (2018 edition) was used for DRG grouping, and SPSS 24.0 software was used for statistical analysis.ResultsThose with complete birth and admission weight accounted for 77.1% of the first page data of newborns. For the DRG group with closely related neonatal weight, birth weight and admission weight were used as the entry condition respectively, and the enrollment consistency and difference accounted for 97.6% and 2.4%, respectively. Of the 1 821 cases with differences in enrollment, 83.1% and 8.5% were accurately enrolled according to birth weight and admission weight, respectively. The mean days of birth of newborns were 6.00 days and 18.85 days, respectively. Neonates with average days of birth ≤7 days were accurately enrolled according to birth weight; newborns with average days of birth > 14 days were accurately enrolled according to the composition of birth days and accompanying problems. There was no difference between birth weight and admission weight for days of birth ranged from 8 d to 14 d. Linear regression analysis showed that the absolute value of regression coefficient of birth weight was greater than admission weight.Conclusion The effect of birth weight on DRG grouping was greater than that of admission weight. It should pay attention to the changes of birth and admission weight of premature infants, improve the completeness of birth and admission weight of newborns on the first page of medical records, and take reasonable weight as the basis of DRG grouping.

参考文献/References:

［1］曾跃萍，吕亚奇，田 剑，等. 新生儿DRGs分组PU11组中影响总费用的因素分析［J］.中国卫生质量管理, 2021,27（5）:47-51. ［2］江载芳,申昆玲,沈 颖,等.诸福棠实用儿科学［M］.8版.北京:人民卫生出版社，2015:18,422. ［3］IHACPA.AR-DRG Version 9.0 - Final Report 1 December 2016［EB/OL］. （2017-07-01）［2022-12-18］. https://www.ihacpa.gov.au/resources/ar-drg-version-90. ［4］ABLER S, VERDE P, STANNIGEL H,et al. Effect of the introduction of diagnosis related group systems on the distribution of admission weights in very low birth weight infants［J］. Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal & Neonatal Edition, 2011, 96(3):186-189. ［5］ENDRICH O, TRIEP K, TORBICA N，et al. Changepoint analysis of gestational age and birth weight: proposing a refinement of Diagnosis Related Groups［J］. Pediatric Research,2019, 87（5）:1-7. ［6］邓小虹,张宗久,郭燕红,等.CN-DRG分组方案(2018版)［M］.北京:北京大学医学出版社,2018:476-509. ［7］朱 丽，张 蓉，张淑莲，等. 中国不同胎龄新生儿出生体重曲线研制［J］. 中华儿科杂志,2015,53(2):97-103. ［8］国家医疗保障局，北京市医疗保障局.国家医疗保障疾病诊断相关分组(CHS-DRG)分组方案1.1版［M］.北京：中国人口出版社，2021:751-781. ［9］国家卫生健康委.关于印发住院病案首页数据填写质量规范（暂行）和住院病案首页数据质量管理与控制指标（2016版）的通知：国卫办医发〔2016〕24号［EB/OL］.(2016-06-27)［2022-12-18］.http://www.nhc.gov.cn/yzygj/s2909/201606/fa8a 993ec972456097a2a47379276f03.shtml. ［10］邵肖梅，叶鸿瑁，丘小汕. 实用新生儿学［M］. 5版. 北京:人民卫生出版社，2019:87-88，182. ［11］王卫平,孙 锟, 常立文.儿科学［M］.9版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2018: 87. ［12］FENTON TR, KIM JH. A systematic review and meta-analysis to revise the fenton growth chart for preterm infants［J］. BMC Pediatrics,2013,13（1）:59. ［13］王凯戎，蔡予川.新生儿病例（MDC15）DRG分组分析 ［J］.中华医院管理杂志, 1994,10（5）:276-278. ［14］黄小云，朱元方，刘惠龙，等.中国11市93 720例胎龄24-42周单胎儿出生体重曲线及其地区差异特征［J］.中国当代儿科杂志, 2022,24（5）:482-491.

相似文献/References:

[1]周晓燕 姚旺 石小鹏 杨彦平 王琳 程功梅 王超 郗莹 张艳青 王聪聪 陈晓华 贾婉婉 代玉洁 郭文娟.建立高危新生儿肠外营养液药学监护新模式[J].中国卫生质量管理,2018,25(01):084.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2018.25.1.28]
[2]曾跃萍 吕亚奇 田剑 张欣 王丽 刘颖 陈燕华 宋菲 刘帅.新生儿DRGs分组PU11组中影响总费用的因素分析[J].中国卫生质量管理,2020,27(05):047.
　ZENG Yueping,LV Yaqi,TIAN Jian,et al.Analysis on Influencing Factors for Total Expense of Diagnosis Related Groups (PU11) in Neonates[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2020,27(05):047.
[3]郑美徐步龙李浩.1例新生儿葡萄糖注射液浓度错误的解析与改进[J].中国卫生质量管理,2021,28(04):052.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2021.28.4.15 ]
　ZHENG Mei,XU Bulong,LI Hao.Analysis and Improvement of a Concentration Error of Neonatal Glucose Injection[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2021,28(05):052.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2021.28.4.15 ]
[4]付婷辉陈吟仇叶龙董爱然侯东敏郭默宁.新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的DRG分组探讨[J].中国卫生质量管理,2023,30(10):032.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2023.30.10.08 ]
　FU Tinghui,CHEN Yin,QIU Yelong.DRG Grouping of Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2023,30(05):032.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2023.30.10.08 ]

更新日期/Last Update: 2023-05-15