[1]郭程俞晔谢国仁顾松.基于5G技术的严重创伤失血性休克救治模式探讨[J].中国卫生质量管理,2021,28(11):075-77.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2021.28.11.18 ]
　GUO Cheng,YU Ye,XIE Guoren.Treatment Mode of Severe Traumatic Hemorrhagic Shock Based on 5G Technology[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2021,28(11):075-77.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2021.28.11.18 ]
点击复制

基于5G技术的严重创伤失血性休克救治模式探讨
分享到：

《中国卫生质量管理》[ISSN:1006-7515/CN:CN 61-1283/R]

卷:
第28卷
期数:
2021年11期
页码:
075-77
栏目:
质量与信息化
出版日期:
2021-11-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
Treatment Mode of Severe Traumatic Hemorrhagic Shock Based on 5G Technology
作者:
郭程俞晔谢国仁顾松
上海市第一人民医院
Author(s):
GUO Cheng; YU Ye; XIE Guoren
Shanghai First People's Hospital
关键词:
创伤; 失血性休克; 5G技术; 智慧医疗; 救治模式; 质量与信息化
Keywords:
Trauma;  Hemorrhagic Shock;  5G Technology;  Wise Medical Care;  Treatment Mode;  Quality and Informatization
分类号:
R197.323
DOI:
10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2021.28.11.18
文献标志码:
B
摘要:
传统救治模式中，由于衔接不畅、信息不对称、等待时间过长等因素，严重创伤失血性休克患者救治成功率较低。上海市第一人民医院借助5G技术，改进了严重创伤失血性休克患者救治模式。5G救治模式能够明显缩短创伤失血性中度和重度休克患者确诊时间、术前等待时间，减少重度休克患者住院天数，降低其死亡率和并发症发生率。但也存在患者医疗信息调取困难、专职创伤救治医师配置不足或专业性不强、缺乏相关制度保障等问题，仍需不断完善。
Abstract:
In the traditional treatment mode, the success rate of treatment for patients with severe traumatic hemorrhagic shock is low due to poor cohesion, information asymmetry, long waiting time and other factors. Shanghai First People's Hospital has improved the treatment mode for patients with severe traumatic hemorrhagic shock with the help of 5G technology. The 5G treatment mode can significantly shorten the diagnosis time and preoperative waiting time for patients with moderate and severe traumatic hemorrhagic shock, reduce the hospitalization days of patients with severe shock, and reduce their mortality and complication rate. However, there are also problems such as difficulty in obtaining patients' medical information, insufficient allocation or lack of expertise of professional trauma doctors, and lack of relevant institutional guarantee, which still need to be improved.

参考文献/References:

［1］邹强锋.综合创伤急救模式在外科严重创伤急救中的效果［J］.大家健康(下旬版),2016,10(12):107． ［2］纪玲玲.一体化创伤急救模式在严重创伤患者急救中的应用分析［J］.中国民康医学,2017,29(8):20-21． ［3］张千彧,邱宾,刘伟军,等. 5G技术助力“互联网+医疗”健康管理模式发展［J］. 中国卫生质量管理, 2020, 27(6):89-92. ［4］王英,刘励军,许海波.创伤中心成功移植的典范：法国格勒诺布尔Ⅰ级创伤中心特色［J］.中华急诊医学杂志,2018,27(5):476-479. ［5］白祥军,张连阳,赵小纲,等.推进区域性创伤中心建设与分级认证［J］.中华急诊医学杂志, 2016, 25(5):557-559. ［6］巫雪明.优化院前急救网络对严重创伤患者救治的影响观察［J］.医药前沿,2018,29(8):370-371. ［7］周开国,李建忠,贾慧.不同院前干预救治模式对重症多发创伤患者预后的影响［J］.中华急诊医学杂志,2016,25(3):362-365. ［8］Olaussen A, Blackburn T, Mitra B, et al.Review article: shook index for prediction of critical bleeding post-trauma: a systematic review［J］.Emerg Med Australas,2014,26(3):223-228． ［9］Pearson JD, Round JA, Ingrain M. Management of shock in trauma［J］. Anaesth Intensive Care Med,2014,15(9):408-410． ［10］Kotwal RS, Howard JT, Orman JA, et al. The effect of a Golden Hour Policy on the morbidity and mortality of combat casualties［J］.JAMA Surg,2016,151(1):15-24． ［11］阎晓萍. 前瞻性护理质量管理模式在急诊护理管理中的应用研究分析［J］. 中国卫生标准管理, 2018, 9(2):190-192. ［12］胡培阳.严重创伤抗休克早期值得关注的几个问题［J］.创伤外科杂志,2016,18(10):638-640. ［13］赵晓东,刘红升.严重创伤患者急诊早期救治的研究进展一团队模式、标准化细节［J］.中华急诊医学杂志,2016,25(5):553-556． ［14］唐昌华.综合创伤急救对外科严重创伤急救质量及成功率的影响［J］.创伤外科杂志,2016, 18(9):569-570. ［15］吉木伍里.综合创伤急救模式对严重胸腹外伤患者救治效果的影响［J］.中外医学研究,2016, 18(14):153-154. ［16］汤雪贵.探讨急救绿色通道对提高严重创伤救治水平的临床应用［J］.河南外科学杂志,2014, 20(2):57-58.

相似文献/References:

[1]郭程俞晔谢仁国顾松.5G智慧医疗院前急救模式探讨[J].中国卫生质量管理,2021,28(01):061.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2021.28.1.17 ]
　GUO Cheng,YU Ye,XIE Renguo.Discussion on Pre-Hospital First-Aid Mode of 5G Smart Medical Treatment[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2021,28(11):061.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2021.28.1.17 ]

更新日期/Last Update: 2021-11-28