[1]沈笛 姚远 刘月辉 邱朔 吴俊峰 张文一 刘丽华.CCHI在疑难危重技术评价中的应用[J].中国卫生质量管理,2018,25(01):024-26.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2018.25.1.09]
点击复制

CCHI在疑难危重技术评价中的应用
分享到:

《中国卫生质量管理》[ISSN:1006-7515/CN:CN 61-1283/R]

卷:
第25卷
期数:
2018年01期
页码:
024-26
栏目:
医疗质量
出版日期:
2018-01-28

文章信息/Info

作者:
沈笛 姚远 刘月辉 邱朔 吴俊峰 张文一 刘丽华
解放军总医院
关键词:
CCHI技术难度风险程度手术操作疑难危重
Keywords:
CCHI Technical Difficulty Degree of Risk Operative Procedures Critically ill
DOI:
10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2018.25.1.09
摘要:
目的利用CCHI的技术难度与风险程度赋值对医院科室、医生进行绩效评价,为发放岗位津贴提供借鉴。方法建立CCHI操作项目与医嘱中诊疗项目的对照表,利用CCHI中的技术难度、风险程度赋值计算医院科室、操作医生的考评分值,并进行评价。结论科室、个人等疑难危重综合分值分布具有明显规律性,可以作为识别疑难危重技术的方法。CCHI与HIS诊疗项目的对照还存在一定困难,一定程度上影响了本方法的应用。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo use the technology difficulty and the degree of risk assignment in the Chinese Classification of Health Inventions (CCHI) for performance appraisal for the departments and doctors in hospital to provide evidence for post allowance distribution.MethodsA comparison table was set up for the operation items of CCHI and the diagnosis and treatment items in doctor's advice. The evaluation scores of the departments and doctors were calculated and evaluated from the assignment values for technology difficulty and the degree of risk in CCHI. Conclusion The distribution of the critically ill scores of the departments and doctors showed an obvious regularity, which can be used as an identification method for critical technology. The comparison between the CCHI and the HIS still existed some difficulties, which could affect the application of this method to a certain extent.

参考文献/References:

[1]江芹,张振中,于丽华,等.医疗服务操作分类与编码的设计与应用[J].中国卫生信息管理杂志,2014,11(1):26-29.

相似文献/References:

[1]孙木 周颖明 陈尔真 高卫益.CCHI与ICD-9-CM-3结合建立手术分级评价体系[J].中国卫生质量管理,2017,24(03):040.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2017.24.3.14]
[2]邱朔 沈笛 杜晓辉 曹秀堂 葛莉莉 高博 刘丽华.CCHI分类与ICD-9-CM-3分类对接方法研究[J].中国卫生质量管理,2019,26(05):044.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2019.26.5.14]

更新日期/Last Update: 2018-01-28