[1]李尔清毛怡君鱼丽荣范惠刘海利.介入手术患者ISBAR转运交接单构建与应用[J].中国卫生质量管理,2023,30(10):056-61.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2023.30.10.13 ]
 LI Erqing,MAO Yijun,YU Lirong.Construction and Application of ISBAR Handover Slip for Patients Undergoing Interventional Surgery[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2023,30(10):056-61.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2023.30.10.13 ]
点击复制

介入手术患者ISBAR转运交接单构建与应用
分享到:

《中国卫生质量管理》[ISSN:1006-7515/CN:CN 61-1283/R]

卷:
第30卷
期数:
2023年10期
页码:
056-61
栏目:
护理质量
出版日期:
2023-10-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Construction and Application of ISBAR Handover Slip for Patients Undergoing Interventional Surgery
作者:
李尔清毛怡君鱼丽荣范惠刘海利
咸阳市中心医院
Author(s):
LI ErqingMAO YijunYU Lirong
Xianyang Central Hospital
关键词:
ISBAR标准化沟通模式介入手术转运德尔菲法患者安全
Keywords:
ISBAR Standardized Communication Mode Interventional Surgery Handover Delphi Method Patient Safety
分类号:
R197.323;R47
DOI:
10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2023.30.10.13
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 基于ISBAR标准化沟通模式构建介入手术患者转运交接单。方法采用文献分析法、半结构式访谈法和德尔菲专家咨询法构建介入手术患者ISBAR转运交接单。将2022年9月-11月在陕西省某三甲医院200例行介入手术患者按照入院时间分为对照组和试验组,每组各100例,试验组实施ISBAR转运交接,比较两组患者交接缺陷事件发生率、转运不良事件发生率、转运交接单书写质量以及护士交接班工作满意度、患者(家属)满意度。采用SPSS 24.0软件对数据进行统计学分析。结果试验组交接缺陷事件发生率(7.4%)、转运不良事件发生率(0.2%)显著低于对照组(P<0.05),转运交接单书写合格率高于对照组(P<0.05),护士交接班工作满意度、患者(家属)满意度评分均高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论介入手术患者ISBAR转运交接单具有较强的科学性和实用性,能够降低转运交接相关缺陷事件及不良事件发生率,保证患者安全。
Abstract:
ObjectiveBased on the standardized communication mode of ISBAR, the handover slip for patients undergoing interventional surgery was constructed.MethodsThe literature analysis, semi-structured interview and Delphi expert consultation method was used to construct ISBAR handover slip. From September 2022 to November 2022, 200 patients undergoing interventional surgery in a tertiary hospital in Shaanxi Province were divided into experimental group and control group according to the admission time, with 100 patients in each group. The experimental group implemented ISBAR communication mode for handover. The incidence of handover defect events, the incidence of adverse transport events, the quality of handover sheet writing, the satisfaction of nurses and patients (family members) with shift handover were compared between the two groups. SPSS 24.0 statistical software was used to analyze the data. ResultsThe incidence of handover defect event (7.4%) and adverse transport event (0.2%) in experimental group was significantly lower than that in control group (P< 0.05), the passing rate of transport handover sheet writing was higher than that in control group (P< 0.05), the satisfaction of nurses' shift work and the satisfaction scores of patients (family members) were higher than those in control group (P< 0.05).Conclusion The ISBAR handover slip for patients undergoing interventional surgery is highly scientific and practical, which can reduce the incidence of defects and adverse events related to transfer and handover, and ensure patient safety.

参考文献/References:

[1]LINA MB,MONICA EP,WENDY PC,et al.Safety hazards during intrahospital transport:a prospective observational study[J].Critical Care Medicine,2017,45(10):1043-1049. [2]张 琦,范晓嬿.HFMEA模式在急诊行经皮冠脉介入治疗患者转运交接中的效果评价[J].复旦学报(医学版),2021,48(6):783-790. [3]潘寿玲.ISBAR交接模式结合优化分级转运对急诊介入手术病人安全转运的影响[J].全科护理,2021,19(6):810-812. [4]寇芳芳.ISBAR交接模式结合优化分级转运对急诊介入手术患者安全转运的影响[J].中西医结合护理(中英文),2020,6(11):213-216. [5]朱佳楠,康晓凤,陈京立.ISBAR沟通模式在临床护理中的应用进展[J].中国护理管理,2019,19(8):1276-1280. [6]BURGESS A,VAN DIGGELE C,ROBERTS C,et al.Teaching clinical handover with ISBAR[J].BMC Med Educ,2020,20(2):459. [7]周英凤,顾 莺,胡 雁,等.JBI循证卫生保健中心关于不同类型研究的质量评价工具:干预性研究的质量评价[J].护士进修杂志,2018,33(1):24-26. [8]周英凤,顾 莺,胡 雁,等.JBI循证卫生保健中心关于不同类型研究的质量评价工具:干预性研究的质量评价[J].护士进修杂志,2018,33(2):112-113. [9]张 瑜,李梦蝶,张娅楠.老年心脏瓣膜病患者ISBAR手术交接框架的构建及应用研究[J].临床护理杂志,2021,20(3):47-49. [10]刘梦婷.老年髋部骨折患者ISBAR手术交接框架的构建与应用研究[D].武汉:湖北中医药大学,2020:68-70. [11]尹丹娜,罗 静,徐 飞,等.基于互联网+移动护士站联合ISBAR沟通模式在手术室交班中的应用[J].护理学报,2021,28(24):26-30. [12]常俊霞,孔令红,王 磊,等.ISBAR交班模式在新入院的老年患者交班中的应用效果[J].空军医学杂志,2017,33(6):430-431. [13]高晓云,刘 晔,高利伟,等.优化分级转运联合ISBAR交接模式确保急诊患者安全[J].中国卫生质量管理,2019,26(1):46-48. [14]KALTOFT A,JACOBSEN YI,TANGSGAARD M,et al.ISBAR as a structured tool for patient handover during postoperative recovery[J].J Perianesth Nurs,2022,37(1):34-39. [15]NORTHALL T,CHANG E,HATCHER D,et al.The application and tailoring of Colaizzi's phenomenological approach in a hospital setting[J].Nurse Res,2020,28(2):20-25. [16]倪 平,陈京立,刘 娜.护理研究中量性研究的样本量估计[J].中华护理杂志,2010,45(4):378-380. [17]刘璟莹,刘彦慧,杨继鹏,等.中文版护理交接班评价量表的信效度研究[J].中华护理杂志,2015,50(5):552-556. [18]陈雪萍.心脏介入手术患者转运交接记录单应用体会[J].中西医结合心血管病电子杂志,2017,5(9):6-7. [19]蔡崔春,莫永珍,邬小荣.结构式手术交接单在冠状动脉介入术中的应用[J].江苏卫生事业管理,2018,29(10):1160-1163. [20]范琼丹.SBAR交班模式在心血管介入手术后病人中的运用[J].实用临床护理学电子杂志,2019,4(30):30,39. [21]BELLO J,QUINN P,HORRELL L.Maintaining patient safety through innovation:an electronic SBAR communication tool[J].Comput Inform Nurs,2011,29(9):481-483. [22]FINNIGAN MA,MARSHALL SD,FLANAGAN BT.ISBAR for clear communication:one hospital's experience spreading the message[J].Australian Health Review:a Publication of the Australian Hospital Association,2010,34(4):400-404. [23]王 凤,梁 义,洪嘉敏.ISBAR沟通模式在急诊科护士交接班中的应用[J].医学食疗与健康,2022,20(3):164-166,174. [24]徐 波,陈 莹,张志华,等.ISBAR口头交接标准在急诊抢救室病人床旁交接中的应用[J].实用老年医学,2020,34(10):1099-1100. [25]杨 珍,张宝珍,张 敏,等.ISBAR结构化沟通模式在急诊科护理人员交接班中的应用及效果评价[J].中国卫生事业管理,2018,35(8):579-581,619. [26]胡元凤,陈婷婷.基于ISBAR沟通模式的医院——社区延续性护理在老年COPD病人中的应用[J].循证护理,2023,9(2):343-347. [27]鲁 琳,黄晓花,叶 韵.应用ISBAR结构化模式提高医院内患者转运交接规范性的实践探索[J].中国医疗管理科学,2023,13(1):57-60. [28]余 玲,颜 琼,霍雪琴.基于SBAR沟通模式的标准化床边交接在心脏介入诊疗患者转运中的应用效果[J].中国当代医药,2021,28(19):78-81. [29]付 红,宣 月,霍佳佳,等.护理交接表在脑血管介入术后病人床边护理交接班中的应用[J].循证护理,2021,7(12):1662-1664. [30]戴晓婷,胡晓艳,吉 琦,等.手术患者接送闭环管理系统的设计与应用[J].中国卫生质量管理,2021,28(8):59-61.

更新日期/Last Update: 2023-10-15