[1]贾桂丛 陈莉 常缨 王庆明 赵莉华.献血不良反应分类规范的修订与应用[J].中国卫生质量管理,2018,25(06):012-14.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2018.25.6.04]
点击复制

献血不良反应分类规范的修订与应用
分享到:

《中国卫生质量管理》[ISSN:1006-7515/CN:CN 61-1283/R]

卷:
第25卷
期数:
2018年06期
页码:
012-14
栏目:
特别关注
出版日期:
2018-11-28

文章信息/Info

作者:
贾桂丛 陈莉 常缨 王庆明 赵莉华
河北省血液中心
关键词:
献血不良反应分类规范判断标准分级标准
Keywords:
Adverse Events to Blood Donation Classification Norms Judgment Criteria Grading Standard
DOI:
10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2018.25.6.04
摘要:
目的依据献血不良反应分类指南,对试点采供血机构2017年10月-2018年4月上报的献血不良反应进行评估分级,为完善河北省献血不良反应分类规范提供参考。方法对上报的26例献血不良反应进行评估判断,从反应程度评估、反应类型的肯定程度、反应与献血相关性3方面进行评价。结果在反应程度评估方面,1级(非重度献血不良反应)发生概率最高,占96.15%;在反应类型的肯定程度方面,肯定占69.23%,疑似占15.38%;在反应与献血相关性方面,可能无关(2级)占57.69%,排除了全部其他原因相关性极高(5级)占23.08%,可疑相关(3级)占11.54%,可能相关(4级)占7.69%。结论献血不良反应评估分级增加了判断的准确性和严谨性,有利于管理者根据反应的不同类别与级别进行后续处理,为进一步完善献血不良反应分类分级标准奠定了良好基础。
Abstract:
ObjectiveAccording to the classification guideline for adverse events of blood donation, the evaluation of the adverse events of blood donation reported by the blood collection and delivery institutions from October 2017 to April 2018 were performed which provided a reference for improving the classification criteria of adverse events to blood donation in Hebei Province.MethodsTwenty-six reported adverse events to blood donation were evaluated from the aspects of “reaction degree assessment”, “affirmation degree of response type” and “reaction and blood donation correlation”.ResultsIn the reaction degree assessment, grade 1 (non-severe blood donation adverse reactions) had the highest probability of occurrence, accounting for 96.15%; In the affirmation degree of response type, the positive type of response accounted for 69.23%, suspected account for 15.38%; In the reaction and blood donation correlation, it may be irrelevant (level 2) accounting for 57.69% High correlation, excluding all other reasons (level 5), which account for 23.08%, suspicious correlation (level 3), 11.54%, and possibly related (level 4), 7.69%.Conclusion The evaluation of adverse events of blood donation increases the accuracy and rigor of judgment, and facilitates the supervisor analysis and treatment of subsequent causes according to different categories and levels of reactions, which lays a good foundation for further improving the classification and grading standard of adverse events to blood donation.

参考文献/References:

[1]中国输血协会血液质量管理工作委员会.血液安全监测指南[Z].2015.

相似文献/References:

[1]贾桂丛 陈莉 安翠平 赵学涛 刘建辉.输血不良反应分类规范研究[J].中国卫生质量管理,2018,25(06):015.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2018.25.6.05]
[2]刘建辉 陈文燕 贾桂丛 陈莉.192例输血不良反应的回顾性研究[J].中国卫生质量管理,2018,25(06):018.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2018.25.6.06]
[3]贾桂丛 陈莉 安翠平 王振雷.某省血液安全事件分类规范研究[J].中国卫生质量管理,2018,25(06):008.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2018.25.6.03]

更新日期/Last Update: 2018-11-28