«上一篇/Previous Article|本期目录/Table of Contents|下一篇/Next Article»

《中国卫生质量管理》[ISSN:1006-7515/CN:CN 61-1283/R]

卷:

第31卷

期数:

2024年02期

页码:

043-47

栏目:

医疗质量

出版日期:

2024-02-15

文章信息/Info

Title:

Quantitative Evaluation of Intelligent Pension Policy Based on PMC Index Model

作者:

张烨鲁雨荍

北京中医药大学东方医院

Author(s):

ZHANG Ye; LU Yuqiao

DongFang Hospital,Beijing University of Chinese Medicine

关键词:

智慧养老; PMC指数模型; 政策评价; 量化评价

Keywords:

Intelligent Pension;  PMC Index Model;  Policy Evaluation;  Quantitative Evaluation

分类号:

R197.323；R-012

DOI:

10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2024.31.2.11

文献标志码:

A

摘要:

目的量化评价国家层面出台的智慧养老政策，总结分析其优点与不足，为进一步深化智慧养老政策改革提供参考。方法对国家层面公开发布的32份智慧养老政策进行文本挖掘，选取12份代表性政策作为研究样本，构建PMC指数模型并对12份政策进行量化评价。结果 12份智慧养老政策PMC指数得分均值为6.55，合格等级政策有10份、优秀等级政策有2份；在政策目标、政策评价、政策领域、政策公开方面得分较高。对比两项代表性政策发现，在政策目标、政策评价、政策视角和激励方式方面差异明显。结论我国智慧养老政策整体处于较好水平，但在政策时效、激励方式等方面仍有提升空间。

Abstract:

ObjectiveTo quantitatively evaluate the intelligent pension policies introduced at the national level, summarize and analyze the advantages and disadvantages of the policies, and provide references for further deepening the reform of intelligent pension policies.MethodsText mining was carried out on 32 Chinese policies related to intelligent pension, and 12 of them were selected as research samples according to the results. The Policy Modeling Consistency (PMC) index model was constructed and 12 policies were evaluated quantitatively.ResultsThe average score of PMC index of 12 smart pension policies was 6.55, 10 policies were qualified and 2 policies were excellent. High scores in policy objectives, policy evaluation, policy areas, and policy disclosure. Comparing the two representative policies, it was found that there were obvious differences in policy objectives, policy evaluation, policy perspectives and incentive methods. Conclusion China’s intelligent pension policy is at a good level, but there is still room for improvement in policy prescription and incentive methods.

常用功能

更新日期/Last Update: 2024-02-15