[1]崔媛媛陈晖.北京市266例未成年患者医疗损害责任纠纷案例分析[J].中国卫生质量管理,2021,28(01):092-95.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2021.28.1.25 ]
 CUI Yuanyuan,CHEN Hui.Analysis of 266 Cases of Medical Damage Liability Disputes among Juvenile Patients in Beijing[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2021,28(01):092-95.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2021.28.1.25 ]
点击复制

北京市266例未成年患者医疗损害责任纠纷案例分析
分享到:

《中国卫生质量管理》[ISSN:1006-7515/CN:CN 61-1283/R]

卷:
第28卷
期数:
2021年01期
页码:
092-95
栏目:
质量与法规
出版日期:
2021-01-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
Analysis of 266 Cases of Medical Damage Liability Disputes among Juvenile Patients in Beijing
作者:
崔媛媛陈晖
国家儿童医学中心/首都医科大学附属北京儿童医院
Author(s):
CUI YuanyuanCHEN Hui
Beijing Children's Hospital,Capital Medical University,National Center for Children's Health
关键词:
未成年患者医疗损害责任纠纷鉴定案例分析
Keywords:
Juvenile Patients Medical Damage Liability Disputes Identification Cases Analysis
分类号:
R197.323;D920.5
DOI:
10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2021.28.1.25
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的分析北京市未成年患者涉诉医疗损害责任纠纷案例的具体情况,提出降低医疗纠纷风险的建议。方法对裁判文书网公布的2018年12月31日前266例北京市未成年患者医疗损害责任纠纷诉讼案件进行描述性分析。结果新生儿期患者纠纷发生率较高(55.85%),起源于围生期的某些情况的疾病占比较高(41.13%),未成年患者死亡纠纷发生率较高(35.3%),多次索赔案例占一定比例(10.15%),转诊医疗机构易被连带起诉。结论未成年患者身心与成年患者有一定差异。鉴定意见在诉讼中发挥重要作用,医疗机构需承担医疗过失导致的患者后续治疗费用。建议医疗机构应严格规范诊疗行为,充分履行知情告知义务,规范病历书写,以尽可能规避风险。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo analyze the specific situation of the dispute cases of medical damage liability involving juvenile patients in Beijing, and put forward suggestions to reduce the risk of medical disputes.MethodsA descriptive analysis was made of 266 cases of medical injury liability disputes among juvenile patients in Beijing before December 31, 2018, as disclosed by the website of judgment documents.ResultsThe incidence of disputes among patients in the neonatal period was relatively high (55.85%), diseases originating from certain conditions in the perinatal period accounted for a relatively high (41.13%), mortality disputes among juvenile patients was relatively high (35.3%), multiple claims accounted for a certain proportion (10.15%), and referral medical institutions were liable to be jointly sued.Conclusion There were some differences between the physical and mental health of juvenile patients and adult patients.Expert opinions play an important role in litigation, and medical institutions need to bear the costs of follow-up treatment of patients caused by medical negligence.Therefore, medical institutions should strictly regulate the behavior of diagnosis and treatment, fully fulfill the obligation to inform, strengthen the standard of writing medical records, and reduce avoidable risks.

参考文献/References:

[1]马超,于晓虹,何海波.大数据分析:中国司法裁判文书上网公开报告[J].中国法律评论,2016(4):195-246. [2]唐应茂.司法公开及其决定因素:基于中国裁判文书网的数据分析[J].清华法学,2018,12(4):35-47. [3]左卫民,王婵媛.基于裁判文书网的大数据法律研究:反思与前瞻[J].华东政法大学学报,2020,23(2):64-76. [4]陈特.医事法纂解与疑案评析[M].北京:知识产权出版社,2015:116-117. [5]最高人民法院中国应用法学研究所.人民法院案例选[M].北京:人民法院出版社,2018:81. [6]周敏,邵海.医疗损害司法鉴定与司法裁判:背离困境与契合构想[J].甘肃政法学院学报,2015(3):89-100. [7]苏青.鉴定意见概念之比较与界定[J].法律科学:西北政法大学学报,2016,34(1):154-161. [8]赵西巨.论我国立法和司法对法定外在标准的过度依赖:以我国医疗损害责任鉴定与诉讼实践为例[J].证据科学,2012,20(3):297-312. [9]最高人民法院中国应用法学研究所.人民法院案例选[M].北京:人民法院出版社,2011:41.

相似文献/References:

[1]曹竞予张宇萌张琳琳尹梅张雪.医疗损害责任纠纷司法裁判现状及对策研究:以护理纠纷为例[J].中国卫生质量管理,2021,28(01):088.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2021.28.1.24 ]
 CAO Jingyu,ZHANG Yumeng,ZHANG Linlin.The Status Quo and Countermeasures of Judicial Adjudication of Medical Damage Liability Disputes: Taking Nursing Disputes as Example[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2021,28(01):088.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2021.28.1.24 ]

更新日期/Last Update: 2021-01-28