[1]吾超杜艳玲李爽张琳苑李沛贺世喆郎红娟.基于CIPP评价模式构建高校护理学教师教学能力评价指标体系[J].中国卫生质量管理,2021,28(08):047-50.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2021.28.8.13 ]
 WU Chao,DU Yanling,LI Shuang.Construction of Evaluation Index for Teaching Ability of Nursing Teachers in Colleges and Universities Based on CIPP Evaluation Mode[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2021,28(08):047-50.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2021.28.8.13 ]
点击复制

基于CIPP评价模式构建高校护理学教师教学能力评价指标体系
分享到:

《中国卫生质量管理》[ISSN:1006-7515/CN:CN 61-1283/R]

卷:
第28卷
期数:
2021年08期
页码:
047-50
栏目:
护理质量
出版日期:
2021-08-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
Construction of Evaluation Index for Teaching Ability of Nursing Teachers in Colleges and Universities Based on CIPP Evaluation Mode
作者:
吾超杜艳玲李爽张琳苑李沛贺世喆郎红娟
空军军医大学护理系
Author(s):
WU ChaoDU YanlingLI Shuang
Department of nursing, Air Force Medical University
关键词:
CIPP高校护理教师教学能力评价指标
Keywords:
CIPP Colleges and Universities Nursing Teacher Teaching Ability Evaluation Index
分类号:
R47
DOI:
10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2021.28.8.13
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的构建高校护理学教师教学能力评价指标体系。 方法通过文献回顾、质性访谈、专家会议等方法,基于CIPP初步构建指标条目池,采用德尔菲法进行两轮咨询确定最终指标体系。 采用Epidata 3.0 录入数据,使用SPSS 23.0软件进行数据分析。结果两轮咨询问卷有效回收率分别为90%、100%,提出建议专家比率分别为83.33%、16.67%;两轮咨询专家权威系数均为0.892;一级、二级指标第一轮咨询协调系数分别为0.216、0.215,第二轮协调系数分别为0.262、0.279。高校护理学教师教学能力评价指标体系包含4个一级指标和30个二级指标。结论基于CIPP评价模式构建的高校护理学教师教学能力评价指标体系科学性较强,有利于综合评价高校护理学教师教学能力,促进教师提升教学能力。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo construct an evaluation index system of teaching ability of nursing teachers in colleges and universities.MethodsThrough the methods of literature review, qualitative interview and experts meeting, the evaluation index of teaching ability of nursing teachers in colleges and universities was constructed based on CIPP evaluation mode. Two rounds of letter consultation were conducted with Delphi method to determine the final index system. The EpiData 3.0 was used to input data, and SPSS 23.0 software was used for data analysis. ResultsThe effective recovery rates of the two rounds of consultation questionnaires were 90% and 100% respectively, and the proportion of experts putting forward suggestions were 83.33% and 16.67% respectively. The expert authority coefficient of the two rounds of consultation was 0.892.The coordination coefficient of the first-level and second-level indexes were 0.216 and 0.215 in the first round, and 0.262 and 0.279 in the second round. The teaching ability evaluation index system of nursing teachers in colleges and universities included 4 first-level indexes and 30 second-level indexes.Conclusion The evaluation index system of teaching ability of college nursing teachers based on CIPP evaluation mode is more scientific, which is conducive to comprehensively evaluate the teaching ability of college nursing teachers and promote their improvement of teaching ability.

参考文献/References:

[1]王晶晶,史岩,陈勤.“双一流”建设背景下英国、美国高校经验对我国护理研究生培养的启示[J].护理研究,2020,34(12):2183-2188. [2]王洪萍,陈珍琦,张海群,等.基于标准案例的PBL教学查房对护生自主学习能力的影响[J].医院管理论坛,2019,36(9):66-69,43. [3]谢千池,赵颖,朱淼.医学高等院校教师教学能力综合评价指标体系建设的初探[J].医学教育管理,2019,5(5):440-443. [4]叶晶晶,李跃平,曾微,等.基于CIPP模型的福建省住院医师规范化培训制度评估[J].中国医院管理,2016,36(6):41-43. [5]马玲玲.基于CIPP模型构建综合实践活动课程评价指标体系[J].教学与管理,2020,6(9):115-118. [6]顾珊.基于CIPP模式的技工院校人才培养质量评价研究[J].中国管理信息化,2014,17(6):107-109. [7]王春婷. 基于CIPP模型和柯氏模型构建新入职护士规范化培训效果评价指标体系的研究[D].南京:南京大学,2019. [8]刘畅. 河北省高校创新创业教育教师胜任力调查研究[D].保定:河北大学,2020. [9]王钦德,赵毅.Kendall系数的几种计算方法及其原理[J].山西农业大学学报,1993,12(3):225-228. [10]孔艳玲.护理工作环境在临床护士职业认同与工作满意度之间的中介效应分析[J].护理管理杂志,2016,16(11):764-767. [11]Chigona A, Tunjera N. Teacher educators' appropriation of TPACK-SAMR models for 21st century pre-service teacher preparation[J].Int J Inf Commun Technol Educ, 2020, 16(3):126-140. [12]程思诗,马小琴.追踪方法学在护理教学质量管理中的应用[J].解放军医院管理杂志,2020,27(6):583-585,593. [13]赵凤英.多媒体技术在手术室护理教学中的应用效果分析[J].中国卫生产业,2020,17(16):166-167,170. [14]张晓燕. 高职院校护理教师信息化教学能力现状及培训方案研究[D].郑州:郑州大学,2019. [15]余江,朱丹,冯欢,等.护理本专科生临床实习标准化处理流程库教学法构建[J].中国医院管理,2017,37(12):80-81. [16]孙礼鹃,黄俊芝,郭英,等. 360°带教护士评价体系在助产士带教质量评价中的应用[J].中国继续医学教育,2020,12(21):54-57.

更新日期/Last Update: 2021-08-28