[1]梁红梅 林苡竹 蒋红丽 黄华灵 刘雅娟.托管分院服务能力评价指标体系构建[J].中国卫生质量管理,2025,32(06):023-27.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2025.32.6.05]
　LIANG Hongmei,LIN Yizhu,JIANG Hongli.Construction of an Evaluation Index System for the Service Capabilities of Trusteeship Branch Hospitals[J].Chinese Health Quality Management,2025,32(06):023-27.[doi:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2025.32.6.05]
点击复制

托管分院服务能力评价指标体系构建()
分享到：

《中国卫生质量管理》[ISSN:1006-7515/CN:CN 61-1283/R]

卷:
第32卷
期数:
2025年06期
页码:
023-27
栏目:
医疗质量
出版日期:
2025-06-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Construction of an Evaluation Index System for the Service Capabilities of Trusteeship Branch Hospitals
作者:
梁红梅 林苡竹 蒋红丽 黄华灵 刘雅娟
上海交通大学医学院附属新华医院
Author(s):
LIANG Hongmei;  LIN Yizhu; JIANG Hongli
Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
关键词:
医院托管; 托管分院; 服务能力; 指标体系
Keywords:
Hospital Trusteeship;  Trusteeship Branch Hospitals;  Service Capabilities;  Indicator System
分类号:
R197
DOI:
10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2025.32.6.05
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的构建托管分院服务能力评价指标体系，为托管分院服务能力建设提供评价工具。方法以“结构－过程－结果”模型为基础，采用文献回顾、专家咨询法及层次分析法，筛选指标并确定各指标权重。结果两轮专家咨询问卷有效回收率分别为100%和80%，专家权威系数分别为0.892和0.895，第二轮咨询后指标体系重要性和可行性得分的Kendall’s W系数分别为0.192和0.082（P均 < 0.001）。最终评价指标体系包含规模结构、资源支持、制度建设、协作机制、考核评价机制、服务体量、质量安全、运营效率8个一级指标，下设20个二级指标和45个三级指标。权重排前三的一级指标为质量安全（0.242 5）、协作机制（0.195 4）及制度建设（0.165 4）。结论托管分院服务能力评价指标体系具有一定科学性和合理性，有助于引导政府部门和医院管理部门开展托管分院服务能力评估，促进托管分院服务能力提升。
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo construct an evaluation index system for the service capabilities of trusteeship branch hospitals, providing an evaluation tool for the development of service capabilities in trusteeship branch hospitals.MethodsBased on the "Structure-Process-Outcome" model, literature review, expert consultation, and analytic hierarchy process were employed to screen indicators and determine their respective weights.ResultsThe effective response rates for the two rounds of expert consultation were 100% and 80%, respectively, with expert authority coefficients of 0.892 and 0.895. After the second round of consultation, the Kendall’s W coefficients for the importance and feasibility scores of the indicator system were 0.192 and 0.082 (both P< 0.001). The final evaluation index system comprises 8 first-level indicators, 20 second-level indicators, and 45 third-level indicators, including scale structure, resource support, system construction, collaboration mechanisms, assessment and evaluation mechanisms, service volume, quality and safety, and operational efficiency. The top three first-level indicators by weight are quality and safety (0.242 5), collaboration mechanisms(0.195 4), and system construction(0.165 4).Conclusion The evaluation index system for the service capabilities of trusteeship branch hospitals is scientific and reasonable, aiding government departments and hospital management departments in conducting evaluations of trusteeship branch hospitals service capabilities and promoting their development.

参考文献/References:

［1］王进贤. 医联体背景下市级三甲医院托管县级医院的模式探讨及效果评价［J］. 江苏卫生事业管理, 2024, 35 (8): 1072-1074.［2］王君燕,郑亚群,万志强. 整合型健康共同体背景下的新建区院全面托管模式实践与探索：以上海市嘉定区江桥医院托管模式为例［J］. 卫生软科学, 2024, 38 (4): 52-55.［3］马玉琴,帅 力,承建国,等. 某区三所医院托管成效比较研究［J］. 中国卫生质量管理, 2021, 28 (7): 96-99. ［4］帅 力,许 苹,段增杰,等. 基于医务人员满意度视角的医院托管效果评价［J］. 中国卫生质量管理, 2021, 28 (7): 103-106.［5］承建国,帅 力,马玉琴,等. 中西医结合发展路径下的医院托管实践与思考［J］. 中国卫生质量管理, 2021, 28 (7): 100-102. ［6］陈欢欢,江蒙喜,黄二丹. 医疗联合体模式下中医医院托管效果的实证研究［J］. 中国医院管理, 2021, 41 (4): 20-24.［7］董旭强. 三级公立医院托管县级医院效果评价指标体系研究［D］.青岛：青岛大学, 2022.?倓［8］马 杰. 公立医院托管综合评价指标体系构建研究［D］. 北京：北京中医药大学, 2021. ［9］DONABEDIAN A.The quality of care. How can it be assessed? ［J］.JAMA,1988,260(12):1743-1748.［10］伍苑晨,李金学,李小玉,等. 基于三维质量结构模式的护理信息化管理质控评价指标体系构建［J］. 中国卫生质量管理, 2024, 31 (3): 40-44.［11］王力男,杨 燕,王 瑾,等. 公立医院经济运行综合评价指标体系构建［J］. 中国卫生资源, 2020, 23 (3): 217-221，227.［12］孙群,杨 练,马 健,等. 医疗服务价格项目合理性评价指标体系研究［J］. 中国卫生经济, 2024, 43 (9): 44-47，64.［13］张 旭,宫 雪,徐沙沙,等. 基于德尔菲法和层次分析法的中国助理全科医生岗位胜任力模型构建研究［J］. 中国全科医学, 2024, 27 (31): 3946-3952.［14］符雨嫣,王海银,罗雅双,等. 上海市医疗机构国谈药品遴选与评价指标体系研究［J］. 中国卫生质量管理, 2024, 31 (8): 87-91.

更新日期/Last Update: 2025-06-15